Joel Gilbert’s investigative series titled “The Letitia Files” sheds light on the alleged misconduct of New York Attorney General Letitia James. Beginning on March 18, 2025, Gilbert delved into James’s financial dealings, uncovering claims of mortgage and insurance fraud, as well as campaign finance violations. His coverage not only exposed these accusations but also culminated in a referral to the Department of Justice, prompting an FBI probe into James’s practices.
Gilbert’s exploration into James’s background reveals a layer of hypocrisy in her prosecution of Donald Trump. She has accused him of misrepresentation in his property valuations for mortgage applications. However, Gilbert points out that James herself has a history of similar dubious activities. In his articles, he documents how she allegedly engaged in mortgage fraud for over four decades, manipulating information about her properties to secure better loan terms.
His investigations began with a simple question: how could Letitia James claim expertise on mortgage fraud while herself being implicated in such actions? Upon examining her real estate transactions, Gilbert discovered that James consistently misrepresented the number of units in her Brooklyn apartment building. Despite official records indicating five units, she claimed there were only four, allowing her to qualify for lower interest rates meant for residential properties.
Gilbert’s findings did not stop there. One striking example involved a mortgage application where she allegedly listed her father as her husband—a claim that could only be described as absurd. This bizarre assertion raises serious questions about the accuracy of her financial disclosures and her integrity as a public official.
Moreover, Gilbert detailed another instance where James co-signed for a property in Virginia under questionable circumstances. She claimed the home would be her primary residence, despite living in Brooklyn at the time. Tying this transaction to her niece, James sought to present herself as a supportive relative. Yet Gilbert countered this narrative by highlighting the criminal background of her niece’s children, effectively dismantling her sympathetic portrayal.
The repercussions of Gilbert’s work gained traction when it was revealed that the Department of Justice opened investigations into James’s actions in both Virginia and New York. This development indicates a serious escalation in accountability for alleged corruption among high-ranking officials.
Gilbert’s concern extends beyond James. He has expressed doubt about whether Attorney General Pam Bondi will have the resolve to pursue justice against James and uphold the rule of law. Reflecting on Bondi’s past actions during high-profile cases, including the George Zimmerman trial, Gilbert raises important questions about her commitment to integrity in her role as Attorney General.
The significance of “The Letitia Files” is underscored by the apparent media reluctance to cover these allegations. Gilbert noted that major outlets like the New York Post and Fox News initially declined to publish his findings, only to be compelled into action after his articles gained traction through The Gateway Pundit. This situation highlights a disturbing trend where potentially damaging revelations about public officials struggle to gain the coverage they deserve.
In conclusion, Joel Gilbert’s “The Letitia Files” serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of investigative journalism in holding public figures accountable. His meticulous research and unwavering determination reveal not just a pattern of alleged corruption within James’s dealings, but also the challenges of bringing such stories to light in today’s media landscape. As more details continue to emerge, the implications for both Letitia James and the integrity of public office remain paramount concerns for citizens monitoring these developments.
"*" indicates required fields
