A recent rankings list from the U.K.’s Daily Mail provides a sharp critique of the daytime talk show “The View,” placing it at the bottom of a list that evaluates hosts based on attributes such as bias, knowledge, likeability, and trustworthiness. The show’s reputation has long been the subject of scrutiny, and this list confirms what many viewers already suspect: the co-hosts consistently present themselves as a politically biased and untrustworthy panel.
According to the Daily Mail’s “Most Loved and Loathed” rankings, hosts Kelly Clarkson and Drew Barrymore ranked first and second for being fun and positive. In stark contrast, the ratings for Sunny Hostin and Joy Behar landed them in the lower tier, coming in at eleventh and twelfth place, respectively. Ultimately, the entire panel of “The View” was ranked dead last, highlighting the show’s significant struggle to resonate with audiences.
The staggeringly low ratings for “The View” are not a shock for those familiar with the show’s dynamic. The hosts have repeatedly faced criticism for their overt bias and lack of credibility. Behar and Whoopi Goldberg received a dismal score of 1 out of 10 for neutrality, with Hostin managing a slightly better, but still low, score of 2. Sarah Haines was the only co-host who did not find herself at the very bottom, finishing sixth overall.
This ranking aligns with a broader narrative about the show. Critics often label “The View” as a vehicle for the Democratic Party’s agenda in daytime programming. In November, viewers witnessed Hostin reading an on-air legal notice that contradicted prior allegations against former Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz, highlighting how the show sometimes latches onto sensational claims without substantiation. Hostin’s discomfort during this moment was palpable, demonstrating the internal tension that can arise when falsehoods are publicly corrected.
Months later, another co-host, Behar, faced backlash after making misleading claims about Tesla CEO Elon Musk, describing him as pro-apartheid. That statement led her to implore Musk not to pursue legal action after realizing the gravity of her accusation.
These instances are not merely slips of the tongue; they underscore a pattern of behavior where the hosts can issue misleading statements, only to backtrack when faced with potential repercussions. Such behavior raises questions about their integrity. The show might present itself as a platform for progressive views, but it often sacrifices factual accuracy in the process.
It remains doubtful whether this latest ranking will spur any significant change in how “The View” operates. The co-hosts appear entrenched in their approach, delivering content that prioritizes sensationalism over substance. The audience, described as an approving crowd, seems to validate their approach, though viewership trends indicate a shift in public interest. There may come a time when producers at ABC will reconsider the show’s format if these low ratings persist.
As the groundwork laid by this Daily Mail ranking suggests, viewers are increasingly unwilling to engage with programs that compromise truth for political talking points. The clamor for accountability is growing louder, and it remains to be seen how long the executives at ABC will tolerate the barrage of criticism that accompanies a program they continue to air.
"*" indicates required fields
