Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, expressed strong reservations about the possibility of federal intervention in his state. His concerns come amid heightened scrutiny of Democratic crime policies after the tragic murder of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee, in Charlotte while she was using public transit. The alleged assailant, Decarlos Brown Jr., had a long criminal history, with 14 prior arrests before being charged with her murder.
This incident has sparked intense discussions about crime and public safety in cities managed by Democratic leaders. Former President Donald Trump stated unequivocally, “Blood is on the hands of the Democrats who refuse to put bad people in jail.” He, along with others, has criticized so-called “soft-on-crime policies” that many believe prioritize criminals over victims. Attorney General Pam Bondi echoed these sentiments, blaming failed policies for Zarutska’s “horrific murder.”
As the narrative surrounding Zarutska’s death gained momentum nationally, Tillis spoke out against the idea of Charlotte being spotlighted for federal resources. In an interview with Fox News Digital, Tillis remarked, “There are a lot of cities that we should be going to before Charlotte.” He insists that federal action would only serve to “mask the failure of Democrat leaders that are making their cities less safe.” While recognizing there is a problem, he maintained that local leaders must take primary responsibility.
Tillis further explained, “I’m down there working before it became a national thing, work that we need to do down there to fix basically the free ride of the subway there. But it doesn’t rise to a level of national intervention.” He expressed strong opposition to what he sees as overreach by federal authorities, suggesting that local governments should remain accountable for crime in their areas without relying on federal boots on the ground.
Senator Ted Budd, another Republican from North Carolina, offered a contrasting take. He emphasized the role of local policies in exacerbating crime, attributing the current climate to “broken policies” driven by individuals like former Governor Roy Cooper and current Governor Josh Stein. Budd criticized what he referred to as “reimagining criminal justice nonsense,” arguing that local governments should operate without the leniencies of cashless bail systems that overlook pressing social issues like homelessness and drug use.
“What I want to see is local government to operate like it should,” Budd stated. He suggested that the negligence displayed by local officials “invites greater rule,” indicating that a lack of effective local governance can lead to demands for federal intervention, as is happening in places like Chicago and Washington, D.C.
Both senators’ perspectives highlight a growing divide over how each party views the relationship between crime, governance, and intervention. Tillis calls for local accountability and self-reliance, while Budd calls for a reevaluation of local policies that he believes contribute to disorder. Meanwhile, the backdrop of sad events, like the killing of Zarutska, continues to fuel intense debate over the effectiveness of criminal justice reform and public safety strategies in Democratic-led cities. As this discourse unfolds leading up to the 2026 Senate elections, the focus will undoubtedly remain on how these policies affect everyday Americans.
"*" indicates required fields