U.S. Citizenship test changes are on the horizon as the Trump administration contemplates making the process tougher. Joseph Edlow, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), recently stated that the current test is “too easy to pass.” He expressed a desire for a more standardized approach. “Ultimately, what I’d like to see is moving to a standardized test where an applicant goes beforehand to a testing center, answers the questions, we’ll get a sense of whether they understand what’s going on,” he remarked.
The proposed changes could introduce an essay requirement and raise the bar for proof of “good moral character.” Edlow noted, “In terms of looking at good moral character, there are a lot of factors. And it’s absolutely not a clear black and white line as to what is or what is not considered good moral character.” The aim seems to clarify the expectations for adjudicators as they assess applicants.
Under current guidelines, applicants must score at least 60% on the test to secure citizenship, a benchmark that many view as insufficient. The conversation surrounding these changes gained momentum after Edlow mentioned, “We are a law enforcement agency. We are making a law enforcement decision when it comes to immigration enforcement.” His comments underscore a shift towards more stringent measures.
Pro-immigration advocates are already raising alarms over the potential implications of these changes, arguing they could hinder the path to citizenship for many newcomers. Currently, to be eligible for citizenship, most applicants must hold a green card for at least five years or three years if married to a U.S. citizen. They also need to prove continuous residence, good moral character, and pass English and civics tests—covering American history and government. All applicants undergo an interview and must take an oath of allegiance during a formal ceremony.
The Trump administration’s proposed revisions to the citizenship test, reflecting a tougher line on immigration, are poised to spark debate. Already, resistance has emerged from pro-immigration groups who argue that such measures only serve to complicate what they believe should be a fair pathway to citizenship. The reinstatement of the easier version of the citizenship test introduced during the Biden administration also signals a back-and-forth in policy that reflects deeper divisions on immigration within American society.
Edlow has indicated that these changes could be implemented within the next year, keeping the dialogue on U.S. citizenship and immigration in the spotlight. The question of what constitutes a “good moral character” remains complex and nuanced, which could influence how these reforms evolve. As these plans move forward, the stakes for potential citizens and the nation remain high.
"*" indicates required fields
