On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the hefty $83.3 million judgment against President Trump in a defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll. This decision marks a significant legal victory for Carroll, a writer and former advice columnist, stemming from allegations she made against Trump—accusations that he raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s.
In January 2024, a jury found Trump liable for defamation when he labeled Carroll a “whack job” who was “not my type.” The jury initially awarded Carroll $10 million in damages for Trump’s remarks made during his presidency. However, the jury ultimately increased the total damages after reviewing Trump’s behavior and statements.
The appeals court rejected Trump’s claims of presidential immunity regarding his 2019 statements, affirming that he failed to present sufficient grounds to challenge the earlier ruling. The court determined that the damages awarded to Carroll were fair and reasonable, countering Trump’s argument that they were excessive.
Carroll first brought her allegations to public attention in 2019, generating significant media coverage and sparking a torrent of discussions about accountability and the Me Too movement. Trump, on the other hand, has consistently denied the allegations and referred to Carroll’s claims as a “hoax.” He even attempted to discredit her, pointing to past statements where she suggested that “rape is sexy,” comments that led to discomfort during a televised interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.
The legal feud between Carroll and Trump has prompted a series of court battles, with Trump’s legal team already signaling intentions to appeal further, possibly to the Supreme Court regarding another civil case where Carroll was awarded $5 million.
This latest ruling reinforces the jury’s determination that Carroll was defamed and reflects ongoing tensions around accountability for public figures in sexual misconduct cases. The implications of this case extend beyond just Carroll and Trump, as they touch on broader themes concerning the treatment of sexual assault allegations in the public sphere.
As the legal battles continue, both Carroll and Trump remain pivotal figures in discussions about justice, public perception, and the power dynamics inherent in accusations of sexual misconduct. The significance of the court’s decision echoes the complexity of navigating truth in allegations that have captured the attention of a nation.
"*" indicates required fields
