President Donald Trump has made headlines with his announcement over the weekend to issue an executive order for nationwide voting standards aimed at preventing electoral fraud. Central to Trump’s plan is a strong emphasis on voter identification. He has voiced his intent to mandate the use of paper ballots while restricting mail-in voting to service members stationed overseas and individuals who are too ill to vote in person. In his own words, he stated, “Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS!” and urged, “USE PAPER BALLOTS ONLY!!!”
This proposed order is already sparking discussions about potential legal challenges. Historically, states have the ultimate authority to determine how their voting systems operate, which creates a real possibility that Trump’s order could face significant hurdles in court. However, the intent behind this executive order is not merely to reshape the entire electoral landscape with a single stroke of the pen; it aims to illuminate these issues, pushing Congress and individual states to enact legislation that reflects these standards.
Trump has always excelled at rallying public support around issues he prioritizes. In doing so, he lays out specific points highlighting the need for reforms. As a dealmaker, he understands that utilizing an executive order to advocate for voter ID laws places him at the forefront of a critical discussion. The House has already shown support. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has claimed to have successfully enshrined numerous Trump-led executive orders into law, covering a range of topics from public media funding to increased domestic oil production. The question then becomes whether Congress will seize this momentum to support proposed voting reform packages.
In the context of local politics, Trump’s order may inspire factions within the Republican Party in swing states to adopt similar measures. This could be significant, especially considering how public sentiment has shifted regarding voter ID laws. For instance, a recent constitutional amendment passed in Wisconsin mandates voter ID, with nearly 63 percent of the electorate in favor. When voting is framed as an everyday transaction—akin to driving, flying, or renting a car—the case for identification becomes increasingly compelling.
Polling data backs this up. Research shows a majority of Americans support requiring government-issued photo identification for voting. A Pew Research poll stated that “More than nine-in-ten Republicans [95 percent] and about seven-in-ten Democrats [71 percent] favor requiring all voters to show government-issued photo identification to vote.”
On the topic of mail-in voting, the president’s push to streamline voting processes aims to reduce opportunities for fraud. The argument follows that with a shorter chain of custody, the risk of electoral misconduct is minimized—especially relevant as the country moves past the pandemic. Historically, allowing absentee ballots for military personnel and those unable to vote in person has proven effective, and it could work well again.
Ultimately, Trump appears to be solidifying a popular position on a polarizing issue. By proposing solutions, he challenges opposing voices and makes it more costly for Democrats to dismiss the will of the people regarding electoral integrity.
"*" indicates required fields
