President Trump’s decision to federalize police forces in Washington, D.C., paired with the deployment of the National Guard, has sparked considerable discussion about law enforcement strategies amid rising crime rates. The effective reduction of crime in the capital illustrates the potential of federal assistance. As cities like Memphis seek similar help, the spotlight transitions to Chicago, which grapples with an alarming surge in violent crime.
With a population of 2.7 million, Chicago recorded 8,227 violent crimes by July 2025, including 288 homicides as of September 7. This statistic is jarring—nearly nine times higher than London’s homicide rate, three times the rate in Berlin, and five times greater than Canada’s national average. Despite these figures, Chicago’s Mayor Brandon Johnson has resisted federal law enforcement support, advocating instead for social reform initiatives.
Johnson’s preference for social programs over direct law enforcement assistance has garnered attention. He insists that increased funding for such programs is the key to lowering crime rather than a bolstered police presence. However, historical evidence suggests that tougher law enforcement yields significant public safety benefits.
A notable study published in the National Library of Medicine emphasizes that a small percentage of offenders drive most crime in society. This points to the notion that effective policing—specifically the arrest and incarceration of these individuals—can drastically lower crime rates. The Brennan Center reinforces this notion, asserting, “the police measure that most consistently reduces crime is the arrest rate of those involved in crime.” Notably, during the 1990s, a surge in felony arrests in New York City significantly contributed to a reduction in crime rates throughout the city.
The argument advocating for social programs often cites studies that suggest a decrease in crime, yet practical implications often tell a different story. Various initiatives might report slight reductions in specific neighborhoods but lack robustness when considering overall citywide trends. For instance, the Cure Violence initiative, which claims a “17% reduction in shootings,” faces scrutiny. A closer examination of the data reveals inconsistencies and lacks rigorous controls, raising questions about its actual impact on crime.
While there are claims of a “33–42% decline in violent crime arrests” linked to summer job programs, such reductions may result from decreased policing rather than an overall drop in crime. The data often derives from small, self-selected samples and does not yield a clear cause-and-effect narrative applicable to the broader population.
The contentious stop-and-frisk policy, criticized for its implications on personal freedom, is also debated in the context of its effectiveness on crime prevention. Critics often point to low recovery rates of firearms to argue against its utility. Yet, the core logic persists: increased police presence could deter potential offenders from carrying weapons if they know there is a significant chance of being stopped.
The most compelling evidence of policing effectiveness can be found in the dramatic crime reductions seen in New York City under Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. His tenure saw a notable shift in crime statistics. With the NYPD’s force growing by roughly 43 percent and the arrest rates climbing significantly for both felonies and misdemeanors, the city witnessed a staggering decline in major felonies. From 1993 to 2001, offenses dropped by over 62 percent, while homicides decreased by 73 percent.
These historical insights compel a reevaluation of current crime-fighting strategies, highlighting the effectiveness of enforcement over funding for social programs. The lessons learned from New York City’s experience during Giuliani’s administration present a powerful case for a more vigorous approach to law enforcement in cities like Chicago. As crime rates climb and public safety hangs in the balance, the divergence in strategies between social programs and a robust law enforcement presence raises critical questions about how best to safeguard communities across America.
"*" indicates required fields
