Ty Clevenger is not holding back in his fight against the FBI. In a letter sent in April, he accused Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel of deliberately concealing critical information regarding Seth Rich, a former DNC staffer whose unsolved murder continues to spark controversy. Clevenger’s pursuit of transparency has involved demanding access to documents that he argues could paint a different picture of the Russia collusion narrative.
At the heart of the conflict is the FBI’s handling of Rich’s laptop. For years, the agency denied possessing it until Clevenger’s legal intervention forced them to acknowledge its existence. Now, the FBI faces accusations of further obfuscation. The agency has yet to disclose metadata from Rich’s devices, raising questions about what they might reveal.
Clevenger’s frustration is palpable. He has uncovered evidence suggesting the FBI has withheld pages from the CrowdStrike report, which is pivotal to understanding allegations surrounding the 2016 DNC hack. The controversy surrounding this hack has fueled political fires, particularly against former President Donald Trump. He referred to the FBI’s actions as a pattern of “willful defiance” against a court order requiring the release of information related to Rich’s murder.
In his legal battle, Clevenger represents plaintiff Brian Huddleston in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the FBI. His argument is clear: the agency is defying FOIA laws to preserve a false narrative—that Russia, and not Seth Rich, was the leaker of DNC emails. Clevenger’s claims are supported by statements from figures like Julian Assange, who hinted at Rich’s involvement, along with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, who suggested Rich was the source for leaks to WikiLeaks.
The lawyer connects the dots between Rich’s laptop and significant cases involving alleged Russian hackers, revealing that the FBI is not only custodians of Rich’s historical records but also potentially complicit in narratives that could exonerate Russia. He addresses the broader implications of this cover-up, alleging systemic efforts to protect key figures tied to the previous administration from scrutiny.
Clevenger’s insights extend beyond the FBI to the CIA, which he accuses of potentially fabricating evidence to frame Russia. He demands investigations into the CIA’s categorization of documents tied to the DNC email situation, calling for transparency that aligns with the general will for accountability as expressed by Trump during his presidency.
The tension builds further with mention of Aaron Rich, Seth’s brother, who is claimed to have seized Seth’s personal items after his death. Clevenger’s implication here is steeped in suspicion, questioning why Aaron has not authorized WikiLeaks to disclose what they know regarding the email leaks.
In a separate letter to White House officials, Clevenger advocates for reforms to address federal FOIA violations. He suggests appointing a “chief transparency officer” to pursue those within the government who obstruct access to public records. His bold reform ideas illuminate a troubling culture within the bureaucracy, where impunity reigns and federal employees face little consequence for disregarding FOIA obligations.
Moreover, his recent accusations against the Trump administration, including suggestions that they perpetuate elements of the discredited Russia collusion narrative, add a layer of complexity to the situation. Clevenger is prepared to escalate his demands, insisting that Bondi clarify under oath why records concerning the Netyksho case are still being withheld.
Clevenger’s efforts reflect a deep commitment to uncovering the truth, despite the complexities of the legal avenues he pursues. His focus remains on the documents tied to Seth Rich, which he believes hold the potential to rewrite narratives surrounding the DNC email leaks and the broader relationship with Russia. The broader repercussions of this case could reshape public understanding of events leading up to and following the 2016 election, underscoring the increasing demand for accountability and transparency in political affairs.
"*" indicates required fields
