White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed rising crime rates and linked them directly to progressive policies, particularly cashless bail. In her remarks, she pointed out a significant trend in high-crime areas. “There is crime in all states, but the crime in these cities is all in cities that are run by Democrats,” Leavitt stated, emphasizing that the majority of the top 20 crime-ridden cities in the United States are governed by Democratic leaders. The only exception on the list, she noted, is a city in Louisiana.
Leavitt was responding to inquiries about whether the administration intended to collaborate with Republican governors to tackle crime in cities beyond those controlled by Democrats. This focus is noteworthy. Historically, cities like Chicago and Baltimore, both in Democratic states, have received pointed critiques from leaders advocating for law and order. Still, other cities, even those in Republican states like Memphis, have not garnered similar attention, raising important questions about the administration’s approach to crime.
In her remarks, Leavitt continued to argue that the rise in violent crime is a consequence of left-leaning justice policies. She used Jackson, Mississippi, as a prime example. “If you look at a red state, Mississippi, but a Democrat-run city in that state: Jackson,” she explained. “In 2019, Jackson eliminated cash bail for virtually all misdemeanor cases.” This move was positioned as a failure of policy, leading Leavitt to characterize the city as a de facto haven for criminals since 2017.
Also highlighted was Birmingham, Alabama, another city in a Republican state yet governed by Democrats, where sanctuary policies have been endorsed by local leaders. Leavitt cited the Birmingham City Council’s unanimous resolution in 2017 that committed to establishing such policies. “These are cities that are run by Democrats… and they have all supported these disastrous policies which allow repeated career criminals back onto the streets to further commit acts of violence,” she asserted. Such statements underscore a broader criticism directed at progressive governance and its perceived failure in managing crime.
The conversation about crime coincides with ongoing discourse surrounding President Donald Trump’s promises to improve public safety nationwide. His campaign has repeatedly emphasized the need to combat crime trends that spiked in 2020, correlated with protests against police treatment and calls for defunding the police. “The president wants to work with anyone across this country who wants to end these horrible policies and to bring law and order to our streets,” Leavitt remarked, defending Trump’s record and his efforts to cooperate with local officials, particularly in Washington, D.C.
Trump’s administration has spotlighted specific cities as focal points for law and order initiatives. In an act to quell crime, Trump recently asserted federal control over the D.C. police force, deploying National Guardsmen to restore order. This tactic, while effective as indicated by drops in some crime statistics, has faced resistance from local leaders who deem such measures unnecessary or even authoritarian. Leavitt, however, posited that Trump’s actions were both necessary and successful. “Just look at the results of that,” she said, advocating for broader support for the administration’s approach to crime in urban centers.
As the discourse winds through various states and cities, the patterns of governance and their impacts on public safety remain pressing topics. Leavitt’s strong emphasis on the connection between Democrat-led policies and escalating crime trends sparks a larger debate on the effectiveness of current governance strategies. The rise of violent crime — whether in historically Democratic strongholds or in Republican states facing leadership from Democrats — serves as a critical touchpoint for discussions about public safety and law enforcement in America.
"*" indicates required fields
