Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee from Virginia, is defending her latest campaign ad. Released last Friday, the ad directly challenges Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears’ stance on abortion. This move comes amidst a wider debate on the efficacy of focusing on reproductive rights in electoral campaigns, as highlighted by Senator Bernie Sanders’ recent caution to Vice President Kamala Harris.
In Harris’ book, titled “107 Days,” she recounts Sanders’ advice to concentrate on working-class issues rather than narrowly focusing on abortion. Sanders noted that his support for Biden stemmed from his focus on economic matters. Harris’ pivot did not yield success, as she lost all seven swing states during her campaign for the presidency, handing the election to Donald Trump.
The ad crafted by Spanberger opens with footage from an Earle-Sears rally. This clip is followed by a narrator labeling Earle-Sears a “MAGA Republican” and accusing her of advocating for a “near-total ban” on abortion. “So far right, she’s wrong for Virginia,” the narrator emphasizes, making a clear statement about Spanberger’s position leading into the elections.
Spanberger’s spokesperson reinforced the significance of highlighting Earle-Sears’ views on abortion, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. The spokesperson noted, “As we approach the first Virginia gubernatorial election since the fall of Roe v. Wade, Winsome Earle-Sears supports an abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest.” Furthermore, they highlighted Earle-Sears’ past comments, stating she has labeled abortion “wicked” and has expressed a “moral opposition” to a proposed constitutional amendment designed to protect reproductive rights in Virginia.
During her term as lieutenant governor, Earle-Sears has played a pivotal role in the Virginia Senate, needing to sign off on bills passed by the chamber. A resolution from state Senator Jennifer Boysko aimed to establish a “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” if it passed again in 2026. In her personal commentary on the matter, Earle-Sears wrote, “I am morally opposed to this bill. No protection for the child,” which is a reflection of her deeply held beliefs on the subject.
Earle-Sears did not provide a remark following Spanberger’s ad. However, in a previous interview with the Winchester Star during her own campaign for lieutenant governor, she stated her position on abortion is that it should be illegal in most cases, allowing exceptions only for the life of the mother.
Spanberger pointed out that Earle-Sears’ stance further solidifies her long history of opposing reproductive rights. In that same interview, Earle-Sears redirected the dialogue to economic issues, echoing Sanders’ recommendations to Harris. She criticized the “unnecessarily aggressive shutdowns” enforced by the Northam administration, which she argued negatively impacted Virginia’s economy. “Hardworking Virginians,” she noted, had faced economic “assaults” from these policies.
Interestingly, while abortion remains a contentious point in the campaign, Earle-Sears has shifted her focus to another pressing social issue. She is addressing transgender ideology within the educational framework of Virginia. This topic has garnered significant public attention, particularly in regions that were once strongholds for conservative voters. In 2021, the issue surged to the forefront, with Governor Glenn Youngkin effectively mobilizing voter concern in traditionally blue areas.
The upcoming gubernatorial election is not just a battle of personalities but a contest of contrasting visions for Virginia. With Spanberger attempting to capitalize on Earle-Sears’ abortion stance and Earle-Sears pivoting to economic and social issues, the campaign is poised to reflect deep divisions within the electorate. The effects of these debates will be felt as the election draws nearer, shaping the narrative and the voter sentiment in a pivotal moment for the state.
"*" indicates required fields
