Democrat Abigail Spanberger faced intense scrutiny during Thursday’s gubernatorial debate over her support for attorney general candidate Jay Jones. The intensity ramped up following the revelation of disturbing text messages from Jones, in which he fantasized about putting “two bullets” in the head of former Republican House Speaker Todd Gilbert. Both the debate moderators and Spanberger’s Republican opponent, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, pressed her to clarify her endorsement of Jones, but Spanberger avoided a direct answer.
Earle-Sears’s questioning brought the disturbing context into sharp focus. “Jay Jones advocated the murder – Abigail – the murder of a man, a former speaker, as well as his children who were two years and five years old,” she pointedly stated. “You have little girls. Would it take him pulling the trigger? Is that what would do it?” Her challenge was clear: Spanberger needed to show courage and call for Jones to withdraw from the race.
When moderators asked Spanberger directly if she still endorsed Jones, her response was evasive. “I’m saying, as of now, it’s up to every voter to make their own individual decision. I am running for governor, I am accountable for the words that I say,” she replied. While Spanberger maintained that she condemned violent rhetoric as soon as she became aware of it, she stood firm on not explicitly stating an end to her support for Jones.
The debate highlighted a growing concern about violent political speech. This topic has gained urgency especially after high-profile threats and acts of violence in recent years. Spanberger contended that she denounces violence whenever it arises, regardless of political affiliation. Nonetheless, Earle-Sears shot back, accusing Spanberger of only denouncing violence when it is directed at her own party.
Spanberger recognized the need for consistent condemnation, saying, “It is important that candidates always denounce violence no matter which side of the aisle.” She aimed to project responsibility while deflecting her opponent’s criticisms.
Meanwhile, Earle-Sears refrained from condemning comments made by former President Donald Trump, who infamously remarked at a recent memorial that he despised his political opponents. Earle-Sears stated, “As I’ve said before, I would not say that,” reflecting a careful navigation of her stance amid the contentious exchange.
This debate showcased how closely the candidates’ positions are tied to the rhetoric of their party’s leaders. Spanberger’s hesitance to fully disavow Jones illustrates the challenges faced by Democrats as they grapple with the implications of violent political statements. The fallout from the debate is likely to resonate heavily with voters who are increasingly sensitive to political decorum and accountability in the face of rising tensions.
"*" indicates required fields
