An undercover investigation by O’Keefe Media Group has revealed a significant federal contracting scandal involving ATI Government Solutions. This investigation exposes how ATI, which claims to be “Native American-owned,” has manipulated taxpayer-funded minority-preference programs under the Biden Administration. According to the report, this deception has enabled ATI to secure over $100 million in no-bid government contracts.
Melayne Cromwell, a contract manager for ATI, revealed details of their operation in a covertly recorded meeting. She boasted about the advantages that come with their claimed minority status, declaring, “Because we’re Native American-owned, we’re heavily favored for government contracts.” The lack of competition allowed ATI to leverage this status to secure lucrative contracts while outsourcing up to 80% of the actual work. Cromwell stated, “I tell you pass-throughs are a great thing!” emphasizing how the majority of the work is funneled to subcontractors who would not qualify under the same contracts. This scheme effectively allows ATI to pocket significant profits while doing minimal work itself.
The Small Business Administration’s 8(a) program, designed to empower disadvantaged businesses, has become a target for exploitation. Cromwell indicated that ATI is only responsible for about 20% of the contracts, stating, “So, a lot of our subcontractors bid on contracts that were perfect in their industry, but because they weren’t Native American, they wouldn’t win it.” This admission sheds light on how the system is being gamed, with ATI acting as a front to secure contracts on behalf of firms that may be more qualified.
What is alarming is the blatant disregard for fairness in securing federal contracts. ATI, while appearing to be minority-owned “on paper,” reportedly has leadership that consists of two non-Native executives. This raises serious ethical questions about the legitimacy of their claims and the integrity of the federal contracting system. Cromwell’s comments about paper ownership reveal a troubling reality in which the true operations of the business are controlled by individuals whose affiliations do not align with the minority status they claim.
As the Biden Administration has increased its commitment to supporting small businesses, this revelation highlights a concerning trend where front companies exploit racial-preferences for financial gain. Arian, another official from ATI, mentioned that arrangements could be made to show a tribal figure as the majority owner, purely to take advantage of federal regulations. This reinforces the idea that these companies prioritize profits over integrity and accountability.
The investigation comes at a pivotal time, following a Supreme Court ruling that recognized the dangers of falsely claiming minority status to secure contracts. This ruling emphasizes that such actions constitute fraud, regardless of whether the contracted work is completed. The implications of this revelation extend beyond ATI; they serve as a warning to all companies engaged in federal contracting that unethical practices will not go unnoticed.
After the investigation broke, Cromwell sought to distance herself from the comments made during the sting operation. In a written response to O’Keefe Media Group, she claimed the interaction was conducted under false pretenses and denied any ongoing affiliation with ATI. Yet, the recorded evidence presents a different narrative, suggesting widespread abuses within the contracting system.
O’Keefe Media Group has hinted that further revelations are forthcoming, suggesting additional directors from ATI have been caught on camera discussing similar schemes. As these investigations continue to unfold, they challenge the integrity of federal contracting processes and highlight the urgent need for transparency and reform to prevent such exploitation.
In summary, the O’Keefe Media Group’s undercover investigation has illuminated a systemic issue that undermines the principles of fairness and accountability in government contracting. This is not just about one company’s practices; it reflects deeper vulnerabilities within the system that allow for manipulation and fraud. As part two of this investigation looms on the horizon, it promises to unveil more details that could further shake confidence in the integrity of federal contracts and adherence to laws designed to protect taxpayer interests.
"*" indicates required fields
