A woman in California has been sentenced to five years in federal prison for threatening a federal judge in Texas. This case underscores a growing trend of political violence that has seemingly gained acceptance in certain circles. Dolly Patterson, 46, admitted to sending an online message warning a judge in Amarillo to “watch his back . . . for the rest of his life!” This was no idle threat. Federal prosecutors pointed out that Patterson understood her actions crossed legal boundaries. The court imposed the maximum penalty available for her actions.
Acting U.S. Attorney Nancy Larson highlighted the seriousness of such threats, noting, “The safety of our federal judiciary is paramount.” She stated that threats against judges, whether made in person or online, are becoming alarmingly frequent and will face legal repercussions. This particular incident exposes a troubling culture where political intimidation is tolerated, if not encouraged, among some activist groups.
As the judge Patterson threatened, based in Amarillo, has dealt with significant cases challenging policies from the Biden administration—including abortion and healthcare issues—this incident illustrates the risks faced by those in the judicial system. Instead of relying on democratic processes, some activists resort to threats, undermining the rule of law itself.
For years, a narrative has persisted that one side of the political spectrum incites division. However, the evidence shows that violent rhetoric is not confined to one group. It emerges from various factions, often amplified by those who advocate for “justice,” while simultaneously threatening the institutions designed to uphold that very principle. Recently, the assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk shocked the nation, revealing just how deep-rooted the culture of intimidation has become. Sadly, before the facts were fully understood, some rushed to blame conservatives, further perpetuating a cycle of scapegoating.
The urgency for accountability from those who propagate this climate of fear cannot be overstated. Threats—whether verbal or physical—pose a threat to democracy. Those who value the integrity of American institutions must denounce such behavior unequivocally, regardless of the source. Silence or tolerance in the face of threats only emboldens future acts of violence and intimidation. It is imperative for all parties to reflect on their own actions and the impact they have on the nation’s political discourse.
"*" indicates required fields
