Christianity Today, a revered Evangelical magazine established by Pastor Billy Graham, is facing scrutiny after revelations about its financial backers. On social media, reporter Megan Basham highlighted that Christianity Today accepted a $200,000 donation from The Hewlett Foundation, known for its significant funding to Planned Parenthood. This disclosure has sparked a fierce debate over the publication’s integrity and commitment to its original mission.
Basham noted, “This is interesting. In looking into Christianity Today’s financials, I found that the mag is now taking money from the Hewlett Foundation (a MAJOR supporter of Planned Parenthood) to cover US elections.” Her words underscore a concern that aligns with the values of many Evangelical readers who support the pro-life movement. Basham’s remarks caught the attention of followers who share her misgivings about the magazine’s financial entanglements.
The Hewlett Foundation’s involvement raises questions about how a publication founded on strong Christian principles can reconcile such a partnership. Basham further elaborated, expressing a desire for a shift in the magazine’s affiliations: “Seems like it would be much better to have Billy Graham’s publication housed with a company like @canonpress that doesn’t take $$$ from abortion promoters.” This sentiment resonates with those who believe that the publication has drifted from its foundational purpose.
In a follow-up post, Basham revealed that Canon Press is actively pursuing a purchase of Christianity Today, aiming to restore the magazine to its roots. She reported that the company expressed its intent to acquire the publication, citing changes in the Christian landscape as a motivating factor. “I have heard many Christians lament that @CTmagazine has been captured by worldly ideology,” Basham stated, capturing the frustration of many who feel the magazine strays from its original mission.
On the details of Canon Press’s offer, Basham disclosed that the company proposed a $10 million bid to buy Christianity Today, reinforcing the magnitude of such a shift within the Christian publishing sphere. “In its offer letter, Canon specifically cites Charlie Kirk’s spirit of evangelism as their motivation,” she wrote, highlighting a dedication to returning the publication to its purpose as envisioned by Graham.
As Christianity Today grapples with this unsolicited attention and potential transition, critical voices are emerging. Basham noted that many voices in the Christian community are hopeful for a revival of the magazine’s core values. Canon Press aims to resurrect those ideals, potentially aligning with the beliefs and aspirations of a significant segment of its readership.
The tension between financial support from liberal organizations and the conservative principles of its founding continues to inspire debate. Basham’s analysis reveals that Christianity Today stands at a crossroads, with the possibility of realignment depending on who ultimately controls its narrative and funding. The future of the magazine hangs in the balance as it faces the question of identity—a true representation of Graham’s vision or a departure into broader secular concerns?
With Canon Press stepping into the fray, the pursuit of a sale could signify a movement towards a publication that truly reflects Evangelical values. The implications of this potential change will undoubtedly be closely monitored as readers and believers alike ponder what lies ahead for Christianity Today.
"*" indicates required fields
