Graham Platner’s recent exposure as a candidate advocating for political violence and Communism raises significant questions about his suitability for the U.S. Senate. Platner, who is running to unseat Republican incumbent Susan Collins in Maine, has made headlines after old Reddit posts surfaced, revealing his troubling views on armed uprisings and disparagement of law enforcement.
The 41-year-old oyster farmer and Marine veteran attempted to erase his past remarks just before announcing his candidacy. However, his archived posts tell a different story. Between 2018 and 2021, under the username “P-Hustle,” he shared inflammatory rhetoric in left-wing forums, calling for leftists to “Get Armed, Get Organized.” These posts suggest a man who embraces socialist ideologies and urges confrontation against perceived enemies.
His militant suggestions go further. Platner advised leftists to arm themselves with semi-automatic rifles, stating, “If they expect to fight fascism without a good semi-automatic rifle, they ought to do some reading of history.” Such language can cause alarm, especially in a political landscape already fraught with violence. Platner’s admiration for the radical socialist Eugene V. Debs adds to a narrative that emphasizes the seriousness of his earlier sentiments. He expressed a belief that “An armed working class is a requirement for economic justice,” reinforcing his commitment to a complete transformation of society through aggressive means.
Criticism of law enforcement permeates his posts, with Platner labeling police as “bastards” and demonstrating hostility towards rural white Americans. His remarks about this demographic—calling them “racist and stupid”—indicate a broader disdain that could alienate potential supporters. Platner’s approach reflects a divisive undercurrent that could backfire in a general election.
Despite raising over $4 million and gaining endorsements from prominent progressives like Senator Bernie Sanders, his past has begun to overshadow his campaign’s potential. Platner’s attempts to downplay these comments suggest a struggle for clarification. In a statement, he insisted, “I was f-cking around on the internet at a time when I felt lost…I made dumb jokes and picked fights.” He attempts to position himself as a small business owner, a military veteran, and a former “sh-tposter,” distancing himself from the socialist label he once proudly shared.
The campaign unfolds against a backdrop where Democrat politics in Maine could shift by revelations of candidates’ hidden beliefs. Platner’s competition, Governor Janet Mills, stands ready to face off in a primary where age and experience will be focal points. Mills could become the oldest freshman senator if elected, adding yet another layer of dynamics to the race.
These emerging patterns among leftist candidates call for critical evaluation. Recent revelations about others, like Virginia Attorney General candidate Jay Jones, echo cognitive dissonance between public personas and private ideologies. Such instances of violence-related rhetoric challenge the competence of these candidates in an era marked by heightened political tensions.
Graham Platner’s case reflects the necessity for transparency and accountability from those seeking public office. Candidates must navigate their pasts carefully, as predilections for radical change and dismissal of law enforcement can alienate voters and undermine their legitimacy. As this Maine Senate race unfolds, the ramifications of Platner’s past will likely continue to inform public perception and electoral dynamics.
"*" indicates required fields
