New revelations surrounding the January 6 pipe bomb incidents continue to raise eyebrows, specifically regarding the witness who reported finding the RNC’s pipe bomb. According to a recently released FBI report, the bombs had substantial destructive potential, but fortunately, did not detonate. The witness in question, Karlin Younger, provided critical details about the timing of this bomb’s placement, which contradict established narratives.
Younger, who discovered the device in an alley next to the RNC, indicated the attached kitchen timer had only 20 minutes remaining at the time of her discovery. This detail is significant given that the timers on both bombs were initially set for a full hour. Younger stated in her communication with the FBI, “I am the person that discovered and alerted the guards to the pipe bomb found next to the RNC on January 6.” She aimed to clarify the timeline of events, asserting the pipe bomb must have been planted between 12:00 and 12:40 PM EST, based on her own movements that day.
The inconsistencies in Younger’s timeline raise serious questions. She left her apartment around noon for laundry and claims to have spotted the pipe bomb shortly after returning. However, evidence from CCTV footage contradicts her statements. Footage shows her leaving her apartment at 12:33 PM, empty-handed. She entered the alley at 12:34 PM and emerged moments later, at 12:38 PM, heading toward the Capitol Hill Club, seemingly after the bomb’s discovery. This timeline directly conflicts with her description to FBI investigators, where she suggested she was returning from doing laundry.
Furthermore, Younger’s depiction of a suspicious woman in the vicinity also attracts scrutiny. She claimed to have seen a woman around the same height as the unidentified pipe bomber, which is documented at approximately 5’7”. This coincidence deepens the mysterious circumstances surrounding the bomb’s placement and the motivations behind Younger’s observations.
Critical insights from investigative journalist Julie Kelly highlight that the recording of the tube bomb discoveries aligned with pivotal moments during Congress’s proceedings to count electoral votes. This timing invites speculation regarding the intent behind the bomb placements. Was this a calculated distraction during a significant event in American governance?
Moreover, the manipulation of security footage by the FBI has fueled further doubts about transparency in the investigation. Darren Beattie of Revolver News detailed disparities in released footage, alleging that the bureau’s approach to sharing these clips contributes to a troubling opacity. The FBI provided footage at a mere one frame per second, as opposed to a standard 15 frames per second, potentially obscuring crucial details about the actual bomb planting.
The mystery of the DNC pipe bomb, discovered moments apart from the RNC bomb, further complicates matters. Questions loom regarding the lack of urgency from authorities to identify the bomber. Concerns surface about possible connections to individuals with government ties, especially given Younger’s background working with a broadband company connected to emergency services. What role, if any, did she play in this unfolding narrative?
As these inconsistencies emerge and more questions arise, it becomes imperative to scrutinize the actions of those involved in the investigation. The circumstances around the January 6 pipe bombs warrant thorough examination, particularly the fluidity of witness testimonies and the reliability of investigative methods. The stakes are high, and the truth must navigate the murky waters of political maneuvering and potential cover-ups.
"*" indicates required fields
