For fans of “Jurassic Park,” a unique opportunity has emerged to own a piece of dinosaur history. Field Station: Dinosaurs in Leonia, New Jersey, is selling life-sized, animatronic dinosaurs as the park prepares to close. Not just any dinosaurs, but a 39-foot-tall T-Rex and other impressive species are available on Facebook Marketplace. Priced in the thousands, this auction prompts the park’s founder to ask, “Where do 30+ dinosaurs go when their park closes? Hopefully to a good home… or maybe a few unexpected places.” The recommendation? Make sure you’ve got ample space in your backyard to accommodate these colossal creatures.
Reflecting on childhood memories, the author recalls a small dinosaur giveaway from a Sinclair gas station — an apatosaurus that sparked a love for these prehistoric giants. Today, the possibility of owning a “46’ Juvenile Apatosaurus,” complete with a control box and speaker, is just a purchase away for $1,860. The playful concern about landlord approval adds a humorous twist to the idea of housing such a monumental piece.
Meanwhile, in a striking example of statistical mismanagement, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has revealed a significant correction in job reports from the end of President Biden’s term. The Washington Post headline declares, “U.S. employers added 911,000 fewer jobs than first reported, new BLS data shows.” The BLS, once seen as a reliable source, has now raised eyebrows with this major revision. As skepticism grows, the author comments on past experiences with government agencies, recalling the BLS as a gold standard. However, the politicization of data is breeding doubt, particularly with figures released close to a pivotal election. “This timely mistake seems to put the BS in BLS,” resonates, as frustration simmers over inaccurate reporting at such a crucial time.
Turning to sports, the legendary skateboarder Tony Hawk has recently made headlines as well. Known as the GOAT (Greatest of All Time), Hawk’s historic “900” — a remarkable two-and-a-half-turn trick — captivated audiences in 1999 and again in 2016. That very skateboard, used during his extraordinary feat, was sold for a staggering $1.15 million at an auction. The soaring price tag highlights the intersection of sports and commerce, demonstrating how iconic achievements can be commodified. This purchase is out of reach for the average fan but underscores the lasting impact of Hawk’s contribution to skateboarding culture.
In an ironic twist, Dissent magazine, affiliated with the democratic left, is hosting New York City’s “only Marxist food and history tour,” where guests can savor a lavish $250-per-plate dinner while exploring the neighborhood’s rich immigrant history. This event, led by a chef and investigative reporter, offers a buffet of diverse cuisines. It presents a peculiar juxtaposition between culinary indulgence and the historical starvation associated with Marxism, prompting an eyebrow-raising experience that seems more about trend than substance. “Come ravenous!” might turn out to be a fitting tagline for the tour, prompting thoughts about true historical context amidst the contemporary buzz.
History has its share of journalistic blunders, one famously being the Chicago Daily Tribune’s “Dewey Defeats Truman” headline. Fast forward to today, the New York Times recently confused its readers by declaring “Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida.” In reality, Ryan Routh was found guilty. This mishap raises critical questions about accountability in media reporting. With today’s news cycle moving rapidly, can a mere mistake be separated from deliberate bias? Perhaps the Times simply misjudged the situation, though the timing feels suspect.
Social media also reveals an unsettling trend — this time in the realm of odd celebrity fandom. A modern-day twist to past unorthodox affections appears as people express admiration for alleged assassins. A curious case of a fan openly claiming to be married to Luigi Mangione’s AI character highlights society’s evolving relationship with technology and public figures. The absurdity lies not just in AI attachment but in how it reflects a skewed cultural narrative surrounding violence and romance.
Finally, some outlets appear intent on criticizing America’s architectural preferences. Jacobin magazine recently published a piece denouncing those who favor traditional architecture, suggesting it symbolizes social control. “Trump’s Real Architecture Agenda Is Social Submission” suggests a conspiracy linking neoclassical style to the country’s historical injustices. This perspective raises eyebrows, questioning why a preference for elegant design should incite such ire. Traditional designs hardly seem a new battleground, yet they highlight the deep divisions over cultural expression and values in contemporary discourse. Calling attention to architecture as social control seems simplistic when the desire for beauty in street scenes has roots grounded in the appreciation of history.
"*" indicates required fields