A peculiar situation unfolded recently in Scotland, where a self-styled “African tribe” known as the Kingdom of Kubala faced eviction by local authorities. This three-member group, which included individuals from Ghana, Zimbabwe, and the United States, claimed their presence in the woods was a form of restitution for land they alleged was stolen from their ancestors 400 years ago.
The Kingdom of Kubala made headlines as they camped in a woodland area near Jedburgh, promoting their identity with elaborate titles. Kofi Offeh, who referred to himself as King Atehene, and his American companion Kaura Taylor, who adopted the title of Asnat, asserted ownership of the land in a manner that seemed more theatrical than grounded in reality. Their claims and actions drew the attention of law enforcement, culminating in their recent arrest.
Reports indicate that on October 2, 2025, police raided their camp and detained Offeh and Taylor based on accusations of overstaying. Eyewitness accounts depict a scene where officers transported Offeh away for questioning while Taylor was taken into custody. Authorities acted decisively, suggesting that the proclaimed kingdom had ventured too far beyond the realms of authenticity.
Along with Offeh and Taylor, Jean Gasho, Offeh’s wife who referred to herself as Queen Nandi, was also affected. She was instructed to gather her belongings hastily before departing in a friend’s vehicle. The immediacy of the eviction highlighted the stark contrast between their claims of sovereignty and the reality imposed by local law enforcement.
The ramifications of this event extend beyond mere eviction; they touch upon themes of identity and cultural appropriation. In a world increasingly preoccupied with definitions of self, the group’s escapade raises questions about authenticity in identity. The Kingdom of Kubala chose to exist as a fabrication within the Scottish landscape, challenging the perceptions of both locals and observers. Their story exemplifies the lengths some will go to construct identities linked to history while disregarding the complexities involved.
As they left their makeshift camp behind, the clean-up effort by Scottish Borders Council emphasized the consequences of their transient lifestyle. The eviction served as a stern reminder of the limitations of identities created in isolation from historical and geographical contexts. While Offeh and his companions sought to inhabit a narrative deeply rooted in ancestry, they were ultimately met with the realities of law and society that govern the area.
This peculiar tale is emblematic of a broader phenomenon where cultural and historical identities are adopted and adapted without grounding in the intricate truths they represent. It sparks conversations about nationhood, belonging, and the genuine versus the performative in cultural expressions. The Kingdom of Kubala, while claiming a lineage to a fragmented past, faced a reckoning amid their imagined authority.
In conclusion, the saga of the Kingdom of Kubala serves as a lens through which we can examine identity’s fluidity and the often thin line between cultural expression and appropriation. Their eviction signifies not just a loss of their self-styled kingdom but a larger commentary on the narratives individuals create and the societal frameworks that ultimately define them.
"*" indicates required fields
