Los Angeles County GOP Chair Roxanne Hoge has launched a strong critique against the county’s Democratic leadership regarding their recent actions in response to federal immigration enforcement. Her remarks come after the Board of Supervisors voted to declare a state of emergency, which she labeled a “slap in the face” to American citizens.

The Board’s declaration, which passed 4-1, aims to offer relief to residents affected by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. As part of this declaration, the board pledged to provide rent relief and legal aid, while directing county departments to take emergency actions aimed at protecting communities impacted by immigration enforcement. While these measures might be viewed as supportive by some, Hoge feels they prioritize illegal immigrants over the needs of American citizens.

In her interview with Fox News Digital, Hoge described the political climate in California as a constant struggle against irrational policies. “Living in California, especially living in Los Angeles, is like playing a constant game of whack-a-mole,” she stated, emphasizing the frustration residents experience as they confront various ineffective policies.

Hoge’s criticisms reveal a deeper concern about a perceived imbalance in governance. She accused the progressives on the Board of Supervisors of neglecting public safety and basic services that residents depend on. “You keep coming up with more and different ways to spend taxpayer money and to not give us the services that a local government should give you,” she said, highlighting the deterioration of public safety, a clean environment, and the overall well-being in Los Angeles.

The urgency of her concerns is underscored by her contrasting view of what constitutes a real state of emergency. Rather than the federal immigration operations, Hoge pointed to issues like rampant crime and the influence of drug cartels in the area. She noted, “You would think a state of emergency is due to criminal cartels taking over our streets, but no.” This pivot underscores a significant divide in how different leaders interpret and respond to the pressing issues facing their communities.

Addressing the Board directly, Hoge’s rhetorical appeal emphasizes a call to action. “Do your jobs, ladies. Please protect the Americans living in Los Angeles,” she urges, reflecting a demand for a government that prioritizes its citizens’ welfare. Her frustration is palpable as she criticizes the allocation of resources, particularly regarding financial assistance that does not require proof of legal residency.

Meanwhile, the county’s leadership defends the emergency declaration by stating it addresses a “climate of fear” associated with ICE raids. They claim these operations disrupt daily life, impacting businesses, educational institutions, and community organizations. However, a representative for the Board acknowledged the declaration “currently provides no funding,” signaling a gap between intentions and practical support.

Board Chair Kathryn Barger, the sole dissenting vote, expressed concerns that a state of emergency should not be used for issues that do not pose immediate life-and-death threats. “Emergency powers exist for crises that pose life and death consequences like wildfires—not as a shortcut for complex policy issues,” she stated, reiterating the need for thoughtful governance over emotional responses. Barger’s commentary underscores the complexities at play, as she recognizes the fear experienced by families in Los Angeles while cautioning against potential misuse of emergency powers.

In summary, the conflict in Los Angeles County reflects broader tensions surrounding immigration policy, public safety, and the responsibilities of local governance. Hoge’s remarks resonate with many who feel overlooked by their leaders as they prioritize certain narratives over established community needs. The ongoing debate illustrates the challenge of responding adequately to the intertwined issues of immigration and local governance while maintaining a focus on the rights and safety of American citizens.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should The View be taken off the air?*
This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time.

TAP HERE
AND GO TO THE HOMEPAGE FOR MORE MORE CONSERVATIVE POLITICS NEWS STORIES

Save the PatriotFetch.com homepage for daily Conservative Politics News Stories
You can save it as a bookmark on your computer or save it to your start screen on your mobile device.