House Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent announcement about nominating former President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize underscores a significant international campaign. The initiative, aimed at uniting legislative leaders from various nations, is touted by Johnson as a way to formally recognize Trump’s contributions to global peace efforts. “No one has ever deserved that prize more, and that is an objective fact,” Johnson stated, making clear his conviction about Trump’s merits.
Johnson is collaborating with Amir Ohana, Speaker of the Israeli Knesset, to drive this effort. The partnership highlights a concerted focus on presenting a united front for this nomination. As Johnson explained, “together with my friend Speaker Ohana of the Israeli Knesset […] we’re going to embark upon a project together.” This collaboration aims to leverage legislative support from multiple countries to bolster their nomination strategy.
This announcement has sparked considerable debate about the qualifications for the Nobel Peace Prize and whether Trump’s tenure meets those criteria. Johnson addressed these concerns directly, asserting, “It’s an indisputable fact that no president has undertaken the work of saving lives and pursuing peace with such determination and with such remarkable success as President Trump.” His remarks exemplify the confidence that supporters of Trump’s presidency hold regarding his foreign policy achievements.
Why Trump?
The supporters of Trump’s nomination highlight key foreign policy accomplishments during his presidency, particularly the Abraham Accords. These agreements normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. The accords, established in 2020, were significant because they marked the first Arab-Israeli peace agreements in decades, moving beyond traditional barriers related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “This is a true turning point in history. These agreements mark the dawn of a new Middle East,” said former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, emphasizing the historical significance of these developments.
Proponents argue that such tangible outcomes are precisely what the Nobel committee should recognize. Trump had already received nominations for the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize for his global conflict resolution efforts, notably his role in decreasing tensions between North and South Korea and mediating a normalization deal between Serbia and Kosovo. These factors bolster the case for his nomination, reinforcing the platform of his supporters who view his foreign policy as a cornerstone of his presidency.
Global Push for Recognition
Johnson’s campaign aims to do more than simply praise Trump’s record; it seeks to strategically navigate the nomination process. Under the Nobel Prize’s regulations, nominations must come from qualified individuals, including lawmakers and political scientists. By rallying legislative leaders worldwide for a joint nomination, Johnson hopes to create an unprecedented coalition in support of Trump’s candidacy.
This coordinated effort relies on a series of meetings, international outreach, and legislative discussions between allied nations. While Johnson and Ohana’s exact targets for support remain undisclosed, they start from a position of authority as leaders of their respective parliaments. The Israeli government’s backing of Trump-era policies, which many see as having strategic importance for Israel, further amplifies their appeal.
According to the Nobel Foundation, the deadline for official nominations for the 2026 Prize is January 31, 2026, with winners announced later that year. While the selection process remains largely opaque, it typically includes a thorough assessment of each nominee’s contributions to peace.
Political Implications
The timing of Johnson’s initiative coincides with the approaching 2024 election, amidst speculation of Trump’s possible return to the presidency. If Johnson’s campaign is successful, a Nobel nomination could carry substantial weight in both domestic and international contexts. Polling indicates that foreign policy is a significant concern for voters. In 2021, a Pew Research Center survey found that 44% of Americans viewed the Abraham Accords favorably regarding Middle East stability. Additionally, Trump’s approval rating on foreign affairs was notably higher than for many other issues during his presidency.
In Israel, Trump continues to enjoy a favorable rating. A 2020 poll found that 70% of Jewish Israelis regarded his foreign policy as beneficial to their national interests. This approval not only highlights Trump’s enduring support in Israel but also underlines the legitimacy of Johnson’s coordinated push for his Nobel nomination.
Should Johnson successfully garner support from multiple parliaments, this effort could become one of the more prominent coordinated campaigns for the Nobel Prize in recent history. The Peace Prize has often been awarded to various global figures, including U.S. Presidents who faced their share of controversy, prompting public debate about the nature of their achievements.
Criticism and Controversy
Despite the momentum behind Johnson’s campaign, Trump’s foreign policy is not without detractors. Critics point to his administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and other contentious decisions as signs of a foreign policy marked by instability. They argue that his confrontational approaches could overshadow diplomatic efforts and highlight ongoing conflicts in regions like Afghanistan and Syria.
Nonetheless, Johnson and his supporters remain steadfast. “This isn’t about fanfare. It’s about facts,” Johnson noted. He emphasizes that Trump’s tenure saw tangible steps toward peace that should not be dismissed, stating, “He succeeded where others failed. Peace came under his watch—not perfect, not across the board, but real, tangible peace. That can’t be ignored.”
Though Amir Ohana has not publicly expanded on his support for the nomination, the Knesset has indicated that the Abraham Accords represent a significant milestone for Israeli diplomacy. This collaborative sentiment continues to shape the landscape of the nomination campaign.
Next Steps
With over a year before the 2026 Nobel nomination process officially begins, Johnson’s campaign faces the task of securing endorsements from more parliamentary leaders. Initial signs suggest potential interest from allies in Central Europe, the Balkans, and Latin America, where lawmakers have previously expressed approval for Trump’s diplomatic efforts.
As Johnson’s team advances, the world will be watching closely to see if this initiative evolves into a substantive diplomatic campaign with wide international backing, or merely ends as a symbolic display. “We are not doing this lightly,” Johnson concluded, affirming their commitment to building a coalition that acknowledges Trump’s diplomatic contributions. “That begins with Donald J. Trump.”
"*" indicates required fields
