Mikie Sherrill Under Fire for Accepting Chinese Communist Party-Linked Donations
Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic candidate for governor of New Jersey, finds herself in hot water after campaign finance disclosures revealed that she received over $65,800 from a U.S.-based Chinese auto executive with known ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This development raises significant alarm bells regarding foreign influence in American elections.
The controversy stems from two checks totaling $60,000 made out to the “One Giant Leap” super PAC, which is actively supporting Sherrill’s campaign. Additionally, Sherrill accepted a maximum individual donation of $5,800 directly from Pin Ni, the executive in question. The backlash has been immediate, with commentators on social media amplifying the concerns. One viral tweet underscored the magnitude of the issue: “🚨 HOLY SMOKES! New Jersey governor candidate Mikie Sherrill (D) is being grilled for taking CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY-linked dollars for her campaign…”
Documented Ties to CCP
Pin Ni heads Wanxiang America Corporation, the U.S. branch of Wanxiang Group, which is often criticized for its close relationships with CCP leadership. Founded by Lu Guanqiu, Ni’s father-in-law, Wanxiang has long been associated with political maneuvering in both China and the United States. Its press releases laud the CCP and its leaders, further muddying the waters for Sherrill’s campaign.
A particularly telling press release from 2021 referred to Lu Guanqiu as a “National Outstanding Communist Party Member,” highlighting his loyalty to the Party as a badge of honor. Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a tribute, indicated that Guanqiu’s actions were aligned with Party directives.
National security experts have voiced concerns. Michael Lucci, CEO of State Armor, expressed: “The donor, Pin Ni, has an extensive history of assisting the CCP’s political warfare and influence operations in the U.S. Taking money from Ni is disqualifying.”
Potential Legal Violation
U.S. federal law explicitly prohibits campaign contributions from foreign nationals. While Ni operates a business in the country and may possess permanent resident status, there are calls for an inquiry into the legality of his donations. Paul Kamenar, a legal advisor for the National Legal and Policy Center, contended, “There must be an investigation to determine whether or not Mikie Sherrill violated election laws by accepting campaign contributions from not only a foreign national, but worse, a member of the Chinese Communist Party.”
If Ni is found to lack permanent residency in the U.S., Sherrill’s acceptance of his funds—both directly and via the super PAC—could constitute a serious breach of federal law. Beyond legality, the incident raises troubling questions about Sherrill’s vetting processes and ethical standards.
CCP Influence in U.S. Politics
This incident isn’t isolated. Ni has previously supported other candidates, including donating $50,000 to Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger. That connection raised eyebrows, particularly concerning Spanberger’s stance on foreign threats versus her acceptance of funds from a CCP-linked contributor.
Data reviewed by multiple media sources reveals that since 2020, Ni has donated over $1 million to various political initiatives in the U.S., mainly favoring Democratic candidates. Ironically, some recipients serve on the House Select Committee investigating the CCP. This highlights a troubling inconsistency in addressing foreign influence while also benefiting financially from it.
Business Interests and Political Motives
Questions arise regarding the motivations behind these transactions. Wanxiang Group invests heavily in electric vehicles and green energy—sectors benefiting from federal policies endorsed by Sherrill. Her congressional voting record includes support for significant subsidies for electric vehicles, raising further suspicions about her commitment to national interests versus political contributors.
Joseph Cella, former U.S. Ambassador, articulated this concern: “It is astounding that someone like Mikie Sherrill would turn a blind eye to this violation of federal law and likely CCP influence operation.”
Mixed Messaging on National Security
Despite the growing urgency of the situation, Sherrill’s campaign has not directly addressed inquiries about the donations. This silence serves to intensify scrutiny from both sides of the political aisle. Observers argue that accepting money tied to the CCP undermines her purported dedication to U.S. national security.
In contrast, Sherrill has claimed her Republican opponent, Jack Ciattarelli, profits from corporations linked to the opioid crisis. Yet, records indicate her campaign has also accepted over $25,500 from pharmaceutical companies embroiled in legal battles tied to that very issue. Chris Russell, a strategist for Ciattarelli, pointed out, “Just like Mikie Sherrill got caught red-handed… it’s no surprise to learn Mikie’s hypocrisy extends to taking thousands in campaign contributions from the very pharmaceutical companies she maligned yesterday.”
Election Implications
As the race for governor heats up, Ciattarelli is capitalizing on this controversy. With polling tightening, he is honing his message around Sherrill’s questionable associations and financial backers. This situation could offer Ciattarelli a potent issue to connect with voters concerned about national security.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the murky waters surrounding campaign finance—particularly with indirect contributions through PACs. Although these organizations are meant to operate independently, scrutiny is intensifying around how closely they are aligned with specific candidates.
Growing apprehension about CCP infiltration into American politics and society echoes throughout both parties. As the investigation unfolds, Sherrill’s case may extend beyond New Jersey to any other candidates associated with Ni’s donations.
Looking Ahead
Calls for transparency and stricter regulation of foreign-linked campaign contributions are becoming more pronounced. While Ni’s legal status remains uncertain, his connections to CCP-backed interests stand unchallenged. His substantial donations to U.S. political campaigns represent a gray area in campaign finance that cannot be ignored.
As the political landscape grapples with concerns over foreign influence, New Jersey voters face a pivotal question: Whose interests do their leaders truly represent?
"*" indicates required fields
