Stacey Abrams’ nonprofit, the New Georgia Project, is officially shutting down after significant turmoil and scrutiny. Once heralded as a powerful organization advocating for Democratic causes, the nonprofit’s decline underscores its controversial history. The organization’s Board of Directors released a statement filled with vague platitudes about community engagement, stating, “We are proud of the milestones we have achieved.” Yet, the backdrop to this closure reveals a starkly different narrative—one mired in allegations and legal troubles.
Earlier this year, the Georgia Senate initiated an investigation into the New Georgia Project for illegal fundraising. This inquiry does not exist in a vacuum; it overlaps with a broader political landscape, including ongoing scrutiny around high-profile figures such as Fulton County DA Fani Willis. According to reports, the Senate committee will investigate potential campaign finance violations that have surfaced, along with possible connections to recent firings within the organization that may tie to attempts at unionizing its staff.
These developments come as the organization has faced severe repercussions for its financial dealings. In January, the New Georgia Project incurred a hefty $300,000 fine from the State Ethics Commission after a comprehensive five-year investigation. This inquiry revealed that the nonprofit raised a staggering $4.2 million in “dark money,” with around $3.2 million allegedly funneled into campaign activities. Such statistics raise significant questions about the ethical standards maintained by the organization and its affiliates.
Abrams, a two-time unsuccessful gubernatorial candidate in Georgia, established the nonprofit in 2013 to mobilize black voters. However, her claims of voter suppression have been contentious. She alleges that Georgia Republicans systematically obstruct black voters, yet evidence supporting these assertions remains unsubstantiated. This narrative has often overshadowed her electoral defeats, particularly her loss to Brian Kemp, which Abrams attributes largely to alleged voter suppression.
The closure of the New Georgia Project raises broader concerns about financial accountability among such organizations. There have been calls, notably from certain quarters, for the Justice Department to scrutinize Abrams further, particularly regarding another nonprofit linked to her—Power Forward Communities. Recent reports have revealed that this organization received a staggering $2 billion grant from the Biden administration’s Environmental Protection Agency, despite questionable reports showing only $100 in revenue shortly after its establishment.
Such developments prompt valid inquiries regarding the integrity of fund allocation and the potential for financial mismanagement within nonprofits affiliated with political figures. How does a newly established entity with minimal reported income qualify for such a sizable grant? This question looms large, especially when considering the extensive financial dealings previously associated with the New Georgia Project.
As the New Georgia Project officially closes its doors, the fallout from its years of operation continues to unfold. While the organization’s founders tout their achievements, many observers see a troubling pattern of corruption and mismanagement. The investigation into Abrams and her affiliates may not only redefine her legacy but also prompt a critical examination of how nonprofit money is raised and spent in the realm of political activism. The future of the organizations connected to Abrams remains uncertain, but the implications of their operational history are already starting to resonate within political and financial circles.
"*" indicates required fields
