The shifting political landscape in New Jersey is raising eyebrows, especially among Democrats who once counted on the Hispanic vote as a reliable source of support. The recent trajectory points towards an unexpected alliance—with many Latino voters now showing a preference for Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli over Democrat Mikie Sherrill. This trend has profound implications as the gubernatorial race heats up ahead of the 2024 election.
The story of a Dominican-born restaurant owner who publicly declared his support for Ciattarelli after voting for Trump illustrates this change. “I voted for Trump. That’s the first time I ever voted for a Republican,” said Castillo. This testimonial reflects a broader movement in which economic frustrations and dissatisfaction with state policies are prompting a significant reevaluation of loyalties among Latino voters.
As the election approaches, polling reveals a tight contest. Sherrill leads by a slim margin—52% to Ciattarelli’s 45%—as indicated by recent polls. Still, the numbers fall within the margin of error, suggesting that the race is highly competitive. Election experts, like Ashley Koning from the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling, emphasize that turnout efforts will ultimately dictate the winner. Such close numbers indicate that candidates cannot take any voter group for granted.
Ciattarelli’s campaign has tapped into growing disenchantment among Latino voters. For years, this demographic leaned predominantly Democratic, but issues such as business regulation and economic pressure are reshaping that allegiance. Carlos Medina, leader of the Statewide Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, notes Ciattarelli’s active engagement within the community as a decisive factor. “He’s been everywhere… He knows the issues,” Medina remarked, highlighting the importance of accessibility in politics.
Moreover, Ciattarelli’s messaging around immigration has played a crucial role in winning over Latino support. His approach seeks to strike a balance—acknowledging the contributions of undocumented immigrants while reinforcing law enforcement measures. By proposing policies that offer undocumented individuals a “pathway to recognition,” he sends a message aimed at both conservative values and the economic realities that many Latino business owners face.
This balancing act reflects a strategic effort to broaden Republican appeal without alienating core supporters. Recognizing the economic contributions of undocumented individuals—who own over 25,000 businesses in New Jersey—Ciattarelli positions himself as a candidate who understands the intersection of law, order, and economic independence. Patricia Campos-Medina, Sherrill’s campaign vice chair, pointed out the financial impact these businesses have, emphasizing why the Latino vote cannot be overlooked.
Yet, the Democratic campaign is not without its challenges. Sherrill’s engagement efforts have faced scrutiny, with some community members expressing that they see her less frequently at events compared to Ciattarelli’s ongoing outreach. Advocacy organizer Elisa Charters noted, “Quite frankly, the only time I saw Mikie Sherrill was at the walk to Washington.” Such statements underscore the need for candidates to maintain a visible and consistent presence, particularly when courting diverse voter groups.
Certainly, Ciattarelli’s visibility extends beyond his party base. Notable endorsements from Democratic mayors have reinforced his credibility and broadened his appeal. North Bergen Mayor Nick Sacco’s enthusiastic endorsement of Ciattarelli demonstrates that support for a candidate isn’t confined by party lines. This indicates a shift in local politics where pragmatism may triumph over partisanship.
Interestingly, Ciattarelli’s strategy echoes tactics used by former President Trump, who has once again endorsed him. Trump’s criticisms of Sherrill, labeling her a “stone cold loser,” resonate with the sentiment of discontent in New Jersey. Ciattarelli’s public praise for Trump’s administration—giving it an “A” grade—further solidifies his alignment with supporters who favor a tough stance on issues like immigration and crime.
The results from recent polling reveal that Ciattarelli has made noticeable gains among Latino men and small business owners. The rising costs of living in New Jersey and the frustrations regarding the regulatory environment play a significant role in these shifting allegiances. A study highlighting the minimal state contract dollars allocated to Hispanic- and Black-owned businesses adds context to the struggles faced by these entrepreneurs, making Ciattarelli’s message even more resonant.
Thus, while immigration policies are a key focus, the broader economic conditions in New Jersey are now at the forefront of many voters’ minds. Multiple factors—cost of living, taxes, crime—converge to create a climate where party loyalty is less decisive than practical policy. Charters noted succinctly, “When you do the sum total of what each candidate represents… it’s clear who’s showing up.” This sentiment encapsulates the core of what many voters desire: solutions to real-world problems rather than strict adherence to party affiliation.
Lastly, as voices like Castillo’s gain traction in the public sphere, they signal a notable change in perceptions. According to Rutgers political science professor Dan Cassino, “Trump did relatively well in New Jersey in 2024.” Ciattarelli must find a way to convince disenchanted Democrats to stay home on Election Day. With the tide of opinion turning, the November election could very well hinge on these shifts in voter perspective—particularly among those who feel unrepresented and are starting to see their views align more closely with the Republican agenda focused on economic independence and public safety.
"*" indicates required fields
