California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed his outrage on Sunday over President Donald Trump’s decision to deploy 300 California National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon. This news came just a day after a federal judge blocked Trump’s efforts to federalize the Oregon National Guard to protect an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility from Antifa elements. Newsom’s wrath was clear as he called the deployment “appalling,” “un-American,” and a “breathtaking abuse of power.”
Despite his anger, Newsom resigned to the fact that he could not legally stop this action. “President Trump is deploying 300 California National Guard personnel into Oregon. They are on their way there now,” he stated, acknowledging the limitations of his authority. This deployment is not the first instance of federalizing California troops; Newsom remains particularly sensitive about Trump’s past deployment of troops to Los Angeles in June, which aimed to protect federal buildings amid ongoing unrest.
In a statement to the San Francisco Chronicle, Newsom noted that some California National Guard troops were previously slated to help train their Oregon counterparts. However, he raised concerns about the potential shift in their mission. “It’s very questionable that they’re being tasked to do that,” he explained. His administration has been in touch with their legal team, contemplating a lawsuit depending on the specifics of the troops’ duties.
The governor’s alarm heightened upon hearing that the troops might now face an altered mission, prompting him to take to social media. “BREAKING: We’re suing Donald Trump,” he tweeted. He characterized the deployment as a manipulation of military resources for political gain, saying, “He is using our military as political pawns to build up his own ego.”
Newsom’s press office echoed his sentiments, leading with the claim that Trump was “ILLEGALLY sending 300 California Guard members to Portland — flouting the law, and treating judges as enemies.” This sentiment arises in the wake of the federal judge’s rejection of Trump’s previous justification for deploying federal troops, indicating a broader theme of overreach in the administration’s actions. The judge’s ruling articulated that the United States remains a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law, emphasizing the importance of legal protocol.
White House representatives defended the decision, asserting that the deployment was a lawful response to protect federal assets in the wake of riots and violence against law enforcement. A spokesperson emphasized that Trump was exercising his authority to safeguard federal property and personnel. This explanation contrasts sharply with Newsom’s strong position that the deployment is politically motivated rather than a response to genuine safety concerns.
As this situation unfolds, it becomes clear that tensions are mounting not only between state and federal levels but also around perceptions of lawfulness and authority. Newsom’s resolve to challenge the deployment in court highlights the ongoing conflict over the powers held by governors versus the federal government, especially in times of civil unrest.
This episode captures a broader narrative of authority and responsibility in governance, as both sides stake their claims in a heated political climate where every move is scrutinized. The legal battles to come will not only determine the fate of the troops in Portland but may also shape future interactions between state leaders and the federal administration.
"*" indicates required fields
