The NFL continues to alienate conservative fans, adding fuel to the fire of discontent this season. The announcement that Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny will headline the Super Bowl halftime show has reignited a whirlwind of criticism. As a performer known for his outspoken political views—particularly his disdain for the Trump administration and criticism of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—this choice has left many in the conservative community outraged.
The controversy began early in the season when fans expressed frustration over the league’s commitment to social justice slogans like “end racism” in the end zones. Continuing down this path, the NFL performed the so-called “Black national anthem” before games, a move that further aggravated conservative supporters. This season, the NFL’s choices appear to be more about political statements than the love of the game.
Bad Bunny, while popular among certain demographics, made headlines for his refusal to tour the United States, citing fears that his fans could be targeted by ICE. “But there was the issue of — like, f*cking ICE could be outside [my concert]. And it’s something that we were talking about and very concerned about,” he commented, showcasing his stance against the enforcement agency. His previous social media tirades against ICE only solidify his image as a controversial figure. In one video, he referred to ICE agents in Puerto Rico by saying, “Sons of b*tches, instead of leaving the people alone and working there.”
This political backdrop inevitably led to a strong backlash on social media following the halftime show announcement. Many conservative commentators descended upon the topic online. Jack Posobiec, a vocal critic of the NFL’s choices, pointed out that Jay-Z’s company Roc Nation, which has an exclusive deal with the NFL, influences halftime show selections. He wrote, “Barack Obama’s best friend Jay-Z runs the Super Bowl selection process through his company Roc Nation which has an exclusive contract with the NFL.” This op-ed insight hints at a deeper connection between the entertainment industry and political maneuvering, causing conservative fans to feel increasingly disenfranchised.
Benny Johnson added to the chorus of dissent by highlighting Bad Bunny’s cancelation of his U.S. tour. “This is Bad Bunny. He was just announced as the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show. – Massive Trump hater – Anti-ICE activist – No songs in English.” His comment encapsulates the frustration many feel towards what they perceive as a political agenda being forced into a space meant for sports.
Others joined the conversation, often inundating the platforms with sarcastic remarks meant to underscore the absurdity of the situation. One commentator joked that there would be “undercover ICE agents waiting to arrest Bad Bunny during his halftime performance.” This quip, while humorous, reveals the growing tension between fans and the cultural implications of the NFL’s decisions.
Several fans urged others to reconsider support for the league altogether, calling for a boycott. “I think it’s time people boycott the @NFL. I know we love our football. But sometimes we have to take a stand,” one post read. This reflects a growing sentiment among traditionalists who feel their values are being overlooked or marginalized in favor of progressive statements.
It’s clear that the landscape of professional football is changing, with the NFL increasingly embroiled in political controversies. Each season, decisions made on and off the field seem to pivot more toward culture wars rather than the game itself, leaving many fans at a crossroads. As the Super Bowl approaches, the fallout from this performer choice may only deepen the divide between the league and a significant portion of its fanbase.
"*" indicates required fields
