Phil Mickelson, the golf legend known for his prowess on the green, recently took to social media to deliver a knockout blow to the “No Kings” protests against President Trump and related GOP policies. With characteristic humor, Mickelson sarcastically praised the demonstrations for making progress on what he described as “Biden-era auto pen pardons” and other notable achievements. This witty remark quickly gained traction online, showcasing Mickelson’s blend of sport and political commentary.
The golfer’s political engagement doesn’t end with this quip. He has taken aim at Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, labeling him a “traitor” for opposing the SAVE Act, a piece of legislation aimed at ensuring non-citizen voting is restricted in federal elections. Mickelson’s criticisms arose after Schumer vocally derided the act, which aims to verify citizenship to prevent potential fraud. This back-and-forth exemplifies how Mickelson isn’t just a figure on the golf course but also a vocal participant in political discourse.
His satirical post about the “No Kings” protests resonated particularly well with conservative circles amid heightened political tensions. “On this special day as we all gather to fight against blanket auto pen pardons and executive orders, lawlessness, and stealing citizens’ resources for illegal non-citizens, I believe it has worked!!” Mickelson quipped, humorously celebrating the supposed triumph of the protests. This clever take prompted supportive reactions from his followers, with comments such as, “I am a fan because of your politics,” underscoring his popularity beyond the sport.
However, Mickelson’s outspoken views haven’t been without backlash. Some critics on the left expressed their disappointment, regretting their past support for him based on his golfing talent. One comment derisively remarked, “You are so sorry, Phil,” while another suggested his political stance was a desperate attempt at remaining relevant. These remarks highlight how divisive the intersection of sports and politics can be, as athletes express their opinions in an increasingly polarized environment.
Returning to his clash with Schumer, the golfer didn’t hold back. He responded passionately to Schumer’s assertions that the SAVE Act was “DONE” and wouldn’t make it to vote, stating bluntly, “How is this fighting for Americans? How is letting non-citizens vote in American elections a good thing? It is NOT!” This pointed rebuttal reveals Mickelson’s strong conviction on electoral integrity and his dedication to advocating for what he believes is in the best interest of American citizens.
In that context, it’s worth noting the complexity of the debate surrounding non-citizen voting. Critics may dismiss concerns about the issue, but Mickelson boldly disagreed, arguing that many people, especially those in California, are aware of the challenges posed by non-citizens participating in elections. His response, which carried a defensive yet assertive tone, demonstrated his willingness to engage directly and decisively in contentious political issues.
What’s clear is that Mickelson isn’t just a golf icon; he’s an influential voice in the political arena. By leveraging his platform, he engages with fans and opponents alike, stirring discussions that go beyond the links. His blend of sports and politics, tied together with humor, showcases a unique approach to addressing significant issues that resonate with many Americans today.
"*" indicates required fields
