The recent announcement by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) regarding its withdrawal from Turkey signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing peace negotiations with Ankara. The move, now set for October 26, 2025, stems from a critical decision made earlier, where the PKK chose to disarm and disband following a call from their imprisoned leader, Abdullah Öcalan. This withdrawal is not merely a tactical maneuver; it represents a broader shift towards peace within a region long ravaged by conflict.
An estimated 200 to 300 fighters are expected to move to the Qandil Mountains in northern Iraq, marking a significant step in the group’s efforts to redefine its role from a militant organization to a legitimate political entity. This transition was highlighted during a weapons destruction ceremony in July, which Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hailed as an “irreversible turning point.” Such ceremonies can symbolize goodwill and intent, addressing both public and governmental desires for resolution.
Key figures within the PKK, such as senior leader Sabri Ok, have stressed the need for specific legal reforms to support former fighters transitioning to civilian life. Ok pointed out, “Specific laws, not just a general amnesty, are needed,” underscoring the necessity for a comprehensive approach to reform that fosters true integration and stability. The Turkish government has responded by forming a 51-member parliamentary commission tasked with devising this legal framework, a clear indication of political will to engage in serious discussions about the future.
The ramifications of the PKK’s withdrawal extend beyond Turkey’s borders. In Syria, the leader of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), Mazloum Abdi, welcomed the development. However, he clarified that his group would remain armed and that Öcalan’s call does not cover the SDF. Analysts interpret this divergence as a potential opportunity for de-escalation of tensions between Turkey and Kurdish forces, particularly concerning recent accords aimed at disbanding specific command structures.
In Iraq, the PKK’s relocation is to the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region, notably the Medya Defense Areas. This area has been a longstanding target for Turkish military operations, often with implicit support from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). The delicate relationship between the KRG and the PKK highlights the complexities of navigating Kurdish politics, a region marked by varied allegiances and aspirations among its factions.
A Kurdish source involved in governmental and non-governmental circles expressed optimism about the agreement, viewing it as a “step forward” for regional peace. The source noted Ankara’s potential willingness to grant amnesty to imprisoned PKK members as part of reconciliation efforts, demonstrating a commitment to healing wounds from decades of conflict. A hopeful sentiment emerged that unity among Kurdish groups could lead to greater stability in the Middle East, as the source emphasized, “In the end, they are Kurds. It doesn’t matter if we have different ideas or not.”
The impact of this peace process is becoming evident in daily life in Iraqi Kurdistan. Villagers previously unable to return to their lands due to ongoing violence are now cautiously optimistic about the future. As the source explained, “Hopefully, there’s no more violence in Bashur (Southern Kurdistan).” The promise of peace could allow families to reclaim their livelihoods and contribute positively to local economies.
However, the journey toward lasting peace is fraught with challenges. Key issues remain, including the fate of Öcalan, political dynamics among Kurds in Rojava, and the geopolitical interests of Turkey, Iran, and Russia concerning Kurdish autonomy. Addressing these complexities will be crucial for any sustainable resolution.
The PKK’s withdrawal marks one of the most significant openings for peace the region has experienced in decades. As stakeholders engage in discussions to shape this transformative moment, the hope is that a successful peace process could finally bring an end to a forty-year conflict and reduce the instability that has plagued the region. The potential for a new chapter in Kurdish and regional history hinges on the careful fostering of dialogue and the solidification of legal protections, paving the way for an inclusive political future.
"*" indicates required fields
