President Donald Trump is making it clear that federal workers are on the chopping block unless significant progress is made in negotiations to end what is being referred to as the “Schumer shutdown.” Senator John Kennedy pointed out the absurdity of the situation when he noted, “You’d need an Excel spreadsheet to keep track of all the Senate Democrats’ demands for re-opening the government.” Despite the ongoing stalemate, it raises the question: what is the White House waiting for?
The Trump administration has consistently advocated for a reduction in the federal workforce. This initiative began just days after the president’s inauguration when the Office of Personnel Management reached out, inviting federal employees to voluntarily resign. As a result, about 150,000 federal workers have decided to leave, and many will exit their positions in the coming weeks.
However, this push for a leaner government has left Democrats in disarray. They are alarmed by the prospect of job losses and firmly believe that every federal position is essential, despite mounting national debt. Government spending was already high before the COVID-19 pandemic, with annual expenditures below $5 trillion. That figure leaped to over $7 trillion almost overnight, with spending levels now considered “unsustainable” by many. Yet Congress continues down the same treacherous fiscal path.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed this issue, saying, “We have an administration and a president who are wholeheartedly focused on restoring fiscal sanity to our government and doing the right thing by the American taxpayer.” History shows that while cutting expenses may be unpopular, the necessity for fiscal restraint grows more pressing with each passing day.
The Trump administration has made attempts to tackle the waste and fraud that many experts estimate costs taxpayers between $233 billion and $521 billion annually. A survey from the CATO Institute reinforces public sentiment, revealing that many Americans believe government waste consumes 59 cents of every dollar spent. In light of this, it is unsurprising that 89 percent of survey participants support auditing all government expenditures to eliminate waste. Furthermore, CATO reported that a significant percentage of Americans would back cuts of 40 percent across the board. However, enacting such changes is complex.
Even prominent figures like Elon Musk, who has taken on the mission to reform government efficiency via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), faced considerable pushback from Democrats. While criticism has centered around ongoing increases in federal spending, this much can be said: not all spending falls under the jurisdiction of DOGE. The department has still made notable strides. Recently, it was reported that DOGE has terminated or modified 94 contracts, yielding projected savings of over $546 million. This effort included stopping contracts that were unnecessarily extravagant, such as a $533,000 deal for editing services within the Commerce Department.
While some in the liberal media are quick to dismiss DOGE’s achievements, those intimately involved defend their work. They argue that the organization’s effectiveness will become evident as their efforts unfold. Politicians often prioritize self-interest over the taxpayers. The GAO has acknowledged the scale of waste, indicating a need for a comprehensive approach to address the issue, but little action has come from the current administration.
With the Trump administration now at a pivotal point regarding workforce reductions, this opportunity may not arise again. A significant portion of Americans believes there are too many federal employees, with a majority supporting a trimmed federal workforce. The existing bureaucracy is sprawling, with 441 agencies currently listed in the Federal Register, many of which operate without the public’s knowledge or understanding.
Among those agencies, some could easily be deemed superfluous. The Administrative Conference of the United States, for example, or the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, raise questions about their necessity in a modern government. There are even committees focused on singular issues, like the Citizen’s Stamp Advisory Committee, which evaluates proposals for new stamp designs. Do such niche committees have a place in urgent economic discussions?
One might also question the relevance of the Japan-United States Friendship Commission in today’s geopolitical landscape. The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, which claims to inform public policy through research, could be regarded as less essential than private think tanks delivering similar insights. The accumulation of these entities reflects how the federal government has transformed into a complex network of special interest groups, all vying for favors that lead to convoluted decision-making and inefficiencies.
As the shutdown leaves many federal employees in limbo, it’s a stark reminder that the government is often laden with unnecessary positions and programs. The silver lining is that DOGE employees remain committed to their mission, striving to clean up waste and inefficiency even as the political landscape remains contentious.
"*" indicates required fields
