Former President Donald Trump’s recent comments on social media have reignited discussions about the effects of his auto tariffs, which he claims are having a significant positive impact on major automakers. In a post, he noted that Ford and General Motors are “UP BIG,” praising his administration’s policies designed to boost American manufacturing. This has stirred debate once again over whether economic experts underestimated the tariffs’ potential benefits.
The tariffs, which targeted many imported vehicles and auto parts with a substantial 25% levy, aimed to protect American jobs and encourage companies to produce more domestically. Early predictions from economists raised alarms about steep costs for both automakers and consumers. However, the reality unfolding over the past year has presented a more nuanced picture.
Profit Hits, But Recovery Tied to Domestic Gains
Ford Motor Company recently issued a warning about its earnings projections for 2025 due to a fire at a key supplier’s plant. The incident at the Novelis facility, crucial for aluminum used in Ford’s flagship F-150 trucks, could result in a hefty pre-tax cost impact of up to $2 billion and a loss of 100,000 vehicle units from the production schedule. Nevertheless, Ford’s stock price rose over 4% following the update, showcasing investor confidence in the company’s ability to adapt.
CEO Jim Farley expressed gratitude for the measures introduced under Trump’s policies, emphasizing that they helped the company cope with supply chain disruptions. CFO Sherry House indicated that without the Novelis incident, the company would have raised its financial outlook even further.
Tariffs Reshape the Math for Automakers
The tariffs imposed under Trump’s administration significantly altered the landscape for automakers. According to Cox Automotive, the U.S. auto industry absorbed approximately $25 billion in tariff-related costs during the early months of 2025 alone. Ford projected nearly $3 billion in tariff expenses for the year. However, thanks to strategic adjustments and relief initiatives, these liabilities have been significantly reduced. Ford managed to slash its tariff exposure to roughly $1 billion.
General Motors has also navigated these waters adeptly. With minimal impact from the Novelis fire, GM has maintained its production targets and is experiencing stable earnings for the year. Analysts attribute this resilience to the company’s diversified sourcing strategy and the shift towards domestic product manufacturing, both influenced by tariff policies.
Pivot to Gasoline Trucks Boosts Output
In response to the evolving landscape, Ford is focusing efforts on its most lucrative models. The production of the electric F-150 Lightning is on hold, with plans to boost gasoline-powered F-150 and Super Duty trucks by 50,000 units in 2026. This shift aligns with the demand for these trucks, which are essential for maintaining Ford’s profitability and are less affected by tariff-related challenges.
Farley pointed out that the company is making “substantial progress” to minimize impacts and recover production. This development supports Trump’s argument that tariffs can compel companies to rethink their strategies without leading to industry collapse.
Consumer Price Trends Remain Contained—for Now
Interestingly, consumer prices for new vehicles have remained fairly stable through mid-2025, despite the anticipated rise in costs from tariffs. Average sticker prices did increase year-over-year by 2.3% in June, with projections suggesting further hikes by the end of the year. However, for the time being, automakers are absorbing many of these costs to keep their market share intact.
This trend may not endure indefinitely. Entry-level and imported models, particularly compact SUVs, could face considerable price increases, possibly adding $2,800 to $3,000 in extra costs due to tariffs. Should current conditions persist, consumers could see substantial hikes in vehicle prices across the board by 2026.
Broader Trade Realignments and Legal Clashes
The auto tariffs are a key part of a broader trade strategy under Trump. Recently, he suspended negotiations with Canada over trade issues following a controversial ad that criticized his tariff policies. He labeled this as “egregious behavior,” which reflects the tension in trade relations. In addition, Trump is set to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping to discuss potential easing of trade restrictions.
Domestically, the Supreme Court is preparing to review a challenge to Trump’s Section 301 tariffs, which, if upheld, could solidify the executive branch’s authority to impose trade restrictions based on national security interests—part of the rationale behind the automotive tariffs.
Experts Divided but Outcomes Becoming Clearer
Analysts had mixed feelings when the tariffs debuted, projecting possible consumer price hikes, industry layoffs, and trade retaliation. Although some risks emerged, particularly in the form of increased costs, the job market and production output have not suffered as severely as predicted, especially for major companies like Ford and GM. Sales data from early 2025 even showed modest growth, rather than the drastic declines initially feared.
Analyst David Risinger noted that while industries experienced disruption, the overall impact wasn’t catastrophic. “Disruption, yes,” he remarked, “but fatal blow, no.” This perspective might surprise critics who anticipated more severe consequences. For automakers and investors, the policies could be viewed as a long-term strategy yielding resilience and better competitive positioning.
Looking Ahead
Ford anticipates that the Novelis plant will partially reopen by December, and they aim to offset most losses in vehicle output by mid-2026. With ongoing tariff relief and revamped supply chains, the company predicts a strong financial recovery.
Trump’s provocative question on social media—”Were the experts wrong again?”—has found some backing in the recent numbers. Prominent automakers like Ford and GM appear to have adapted more swiftly than expected, raising questions about the long-term effectiveness of tariff policies. Whether this trend will persist remains tied to trade negotiations, cost management, and consumer willingness to absorb higher prices in the future.
"*" indicates required fields
