Trump Reignites Spy Claims, Targets Obama After Indictments of Former Officials
Former President Donald Trump is back in the spotlight, launching new accusations against Barack Obama regarding alleged surveillance of his 2016 campaign. In a strong statement, Trump claimed that Obama threatened American democracy by spying on him, contradicting findings from numerous investigations that have consistently refuted such assertions.
The former president’s recent comments come on the heels of Obama’s concerns about the latest indictments involving former Trump officials. Obama’s warning highlighted what he sees as an ongoing threat to American democracy, a stark contrast to Trump’s focus on the origin of the FBI’s inquiries into the Trump campaign.
Trump did not hold back, tweeting emphatically, “I know. He says that all the time – HE’S the one that threatened it by SPYING on my campaign. HE STARTED IT.” This bold statement reflects Trump’s long-standing narrative that the investigation into his campaign was politically motivated and founded on illegal actions by the Obama administration. He continued, “Obama spied on my campaign. And he did it knowing it was illegal. But he started the whole thing!”
The backdrop to Trump’s allegations is rooted in the FBI’s investigation—dubbed Crossfire Hurricane—which began in July 2016. The purpose was to examine possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russian interference in the election. While procedural errors were acknowledged, including the mishandling of surveillance documentation, repeated government audits failed to find evidence implicating Obama in the initiation of the probe.
Trump’s claims of surveillance are not new; he originally leveled similar accusations in 2017, alleging that Obama had “tapped” his phones at Trump Tower. He framed the situation as a politically charged attack on his presidency. Since then, many of Trump’s supporters have adopted the idea of a “deep state” conspiracy, despite the absence of verified evidence of any high-level political interference in the investigation.
A critical assessment by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz in December 2019 confirmed that the FBI had sufficient basis to launch the investigation. It pointed to significant errors in applications for surveillance, particularly affecting aide Carter Page, but ultimately found no indication that these decisions were influenced by political bias.
Horowitz’s report stated, “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI’s decision.” This conclusion reinforces the idea that while errors occurred, they were not rooted in partisan intent.
The investigation’s aftermath led to legal troubles for several figures connected to Trump’s campaign. Prominent individuals, including Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort, faced scrutiny, although not all were charged with collusion. Flynn, in a notable case, pled guilty to misleading the FBI but was later pardoned by Trump as the Justice Department sought to retract its charges.
Since the completion of the Mueller investigation and his first impeachment trial, Trump’s rhetoric has increasingly centered on the theme of political revenge. As he emphasized yet again this week, “Obama started the whole thing. He knew it was illegal. He did it anyway.” Such statements suggest a determined effort to shift the narrative in his favor and redirect scrutiny toward Obama.
Obama, for his part, has been steadfast in denying any involvement in the surveillance claims. Robert Litt, who served as general counsel to Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, stated in a 2020 interview that, “There is not a shred of evidence that it was directed by the White House.” This reinforces the ongoing debate over the integrity of the FBI’s investigation versus the accusations being leveled by Trump.
Further contradicting Trump’s narrative is the 2020 bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee. This extensive document validated that Russian intelligence actively sought to interfere in the 2016 election with the intent of aiding Trump. While it acknowledged certain flaws in judgment and procedures within the FBI, it found no evidence implicating Obama in directing the investigation or suggesting partisan motivations influenced their actions.
As the debate over the 2016 election continues, the contrasting perspectives of Trump and Obama emphasize the deep divisions regarding the integrity of the electoral process. Trump’s persistent claims suggest he aims to rewrite the narrative surrounding his presidency, framing it as a victim of a politically charged conspiracy. In contrast, the evidence and expert opinions steer the discussion toward a more structured and fact-based understanding of the events that transpired during that tumultuous period in American politics.
"*" indicates required fields
