Former President Donald Trump has sparked renewed discussion regarding the U.S. Constitution, particularly around the limits of presidential terms. During a flight aboard Air Force One, Trump entertained the possibility of running for vice president in 2028, which could theoretically lead to a return to the presidency if the sitting president were to resign. “You’d be allowed to do that,” Trump noted, but quickly added, “But I wouldn’t do that. I think it’s too cute.” This remark, shared widely on social media, has initiated a wave of legal and political analysis around the implications of such a move.
At the heart of the debate is the 22nd Amendment, which prohibits anyone from being elected president more than twice. Trump served from 2017 to 2021 and is eligible to run for a second term in 2024. However, a third term would be a constitutional no-go unless a workaround can be crafted. Trump’s suggestion raised eyebrows because it introduces a scenario that challenges traditional interpretations of the Constitution.
The notion of Trump running as vice president first surfaced in a broader conversation about extending his influence under this unconventional framework. He insisted that while he was not ruling out the idea entirely, he would not pursue it, deeming it inappropriate. Still, his comments have plumbed new depths in a long-standing dialogue about the adaptability of the Constitution, especially regarding term limits.
Steve Bannon, a key Trump advisor, has echoed sentiments that Trump will regain the presidency in 2028. In an interview with The Economist, Bannon proclaimed, “Trump is gonna be president in ’28…there’s a plan.” His assertion has fanned the flames of speculation and concern, prompting legal discussions about the constitutionality of a potential third term and the implications for American governance.
Adding fuel to the fire, U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles has introduced a constitutional amendment aimed at allowing a two-term president to serve a third term under specific conditions. This proposed change would require significant political maneuvering, demanding broad consensus across Congress and the states—a daunting challenge but one that could reshape presidential norms if successful.
Trump has also begun laying the groundwork for a 2028 campaign, pointing to new merchandise and publicly supporting potential candidates who might carry on his legacy. “We have great people,” he said, highlighting the potential of Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as successors. These endorsements solidify Trump’s standing as a major influence within the Republican Party, while also signaling that he remains a significant player on the political stage.
Central to this discussion is the interpretive ambiguity of the 12th Amendment, which addresses the eligibility criteria for vice presidential candidates. While the 22nd Amendment delineates restrictions on presidential elections, questions remain about whether it restricts a twice-elected former president from assuming the presidency again through succession. Legal experts are divided, with some affirming that ineligibility for the presidency would extend to a vice presidential run, while others argue there’s room for a novel interpretation.
The potential for legal gray areas in interpretations continues to invite speculation. Trump’s team appears ready to exploit whatever loopholes may exist, suggesting a readiness to engage their base in these contentious discussions. Trotting out these strategies keeps Trump’s name front and center in the media landscape, a tactic that sustains his prominence among Republican voters.
Yet, Trump himself acknowledged a critical aspect: public perception. “I think the people wouldn’t like that because it’s too cute,” he mentioned when contemplating the implications of such an unconventional political strategy. This recognition hints at the delicate balance Trump must navigate between appealing to his core supporters and ensuring wider acceptability of his methods.
Furthermore, during the same Air Force One press session, Trump targeted prominent Democratic figures, labeling them as “low IQ.” This tactic is part of a broader strategy to frame political conversations around competence and strength, effectively distinguishing his potential successors from their Democratic counterparts. He juxtaposes his praise for Vance and Rubio against the criticisms of Democrats, attempting to strengthen his narrative leading up to future elections.
The implications of Trump’s assertions, whether taken seriously or dismissed as fanciful, contribute a complex layer to the discourse on constitutional limits and political strategies. As critics point out, challenges to established term limits could provoke significant legal and institutional ramifications, suggesting that any attempts to manipulate the existing framework risk serious consequences. “It’s not just about what the Constitution allows,” one legal scholar emphasized, “It’s about whether the system can absorb this level of manipulation without permanent damage.”
Ultimately, as Trump engages in these discussions, he solidifies his hold over the future direction of the Republican Party. His tactical maneuvering, whether theoretical or practiced, ensures he remains a central figure in upcoming political battles. “I would love to do it,” Trump stated of a potential run, leaving unanswered questions about the viability of such a scenario and its ramifications for American politics moving forward.
"*" indicates required fields
