A recent report from advocacy group Defending Education reveals troubling practices at the University of Minnesota (UMN). It alleges that a race and gender center named RIDGS is providing K-12 teachers with curriculum based on left-leaning ideologies. Topics such as defunding the police and the tenets of the Black Lives Matter movement feature prominently in the lessons, raising significant concerns about the influence of political agendas in education.
The RIDGS Ethnic Studies Initiative actively collaborates with K-12 teachers to create materials that include lessons on “radical capitalism” and “settler colonialism.” Its stated mission is to align programming with the immediate and long-term needs of students, but this claim comes under scrutiny in light of the lesson content. One course assignment instructs students to create “protest art” around causes of their choosing, with suggestions such as producing art meant to make people feel safe in unsafe environments. This blurs the line between education and political activism.
Students are further engaged through a “social identity wheel activity” that prompts them to classify themselves into “privileged” or “marginalized” groups. The implications of such exercises are profound, potentially reshaping students’ perceptions of their identities. With Minnesota law requiring ethnic studies in high schools by 2026-27 and in earlier education by 2027-28, the use of programs like RIDGS is concerning. It suggests an effort to normalize ideological viewpoints within educational frameworks.
Paul Runko, a senior director at Defending Education, voiced his alarm over the situation. He noted that the initiative goes far beyond teaching history or culture; it imposes a “particular worldview” in the classroom. This underscores a broader trend where political ideas originating from higher education infiltrate K-12 systems, influencing what future generations learn. Runko’s insights reflect a growing concern among parents and educators about the direction educational curricula are taking.
Moreover, this is not the first instance UMN has faced scrutiny due to its ideological leanings. In 2023, a professor openly called for the dismantling of systemic structures during a pro-Palestinian event, indicating a pattern of controversial political advocacy within the university’s environment. The report captures campus emails revealing faculty interest in organizing anti-Israel demonstrations, highlighting a commitment to activism over academic neutrality.
A university spokesperson defended UMN’s curriculum, citing its agency in advocating “academic freedom.” However, this response does not address significant questions about vetting processes or parental notifications regarding the curriculum. Concerns remain regarding the type of ideology being presented to young students and the potential disconnect between academic freedom and parental oversight.
Reagan Dugan, Project Manager for Higher Education at Defending Education, characterized the scenario as alarming. Dugan articulated that institutions have framed divisive ideologies as legitimate academic inquiries. He examined how courses invite students to engage with complex concepts while embedding contentious positions into academic discussions. This critique highlights the long-term impacts that such educational practices might have on students’ critical thinking and worldview.
Dugan’s assertion that UMN’s Ethnic Studies initiative illustrates a trend toward merging activism and academia raises critical questions. When slogans like “Defund the Police” appear in educational materials aimed at middle school students, it suggests a troubling intersection of education and political messaging. Encouraging young minds to embrace specific political slogans has significant ramifications for how students navigate their understanding of civic and social issues.
In summary, the Defending Education report sheds light on the University of Minnesota’s Ethnic Studies Initiative and its implications for K-12 education. As faculty members intertwine political narratives within curricula, the potential for shaping a generation’s understanding of their identities and social issues raises profound concerns about the future direction of education in America.
"*" indicates required fields
