Communist Muslim mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani recently faced backlash after altering his narrative about a supposed victim of Islamophobia in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. During a speech at an Islamic center in the Bronx, Mamdani emotionally recounted how his aunt felt unsafe wearing a hijab post-9/11. “I want to speak to the memory of my aunt, who stopped taking the subway after September 11th because she did not feel safe in her hijab,” he stated, struggling to maintain his composure.
However, it quickly surfaced that Mamdani’s account lacked credibility. Reports revealed that his aunt, Masuma Mamdani, actually resided in Tanzania at the time of the attacks, and further investigations determined that she does not wear a hijab. This raised immediate questions about the authenticity of his claims. A social media post highlighted the inconsistency, calling out Mamdani for presenting a relative who, while purportedly a victim of post-9/11 hostility, was neither present nor fitting the description he offered.
In the face of this controversy, Mamdani attempted to shift the narrative. On Monday, he claimed he had not meant his aunt at all, but rather referenced a distant cousin named Zehra Fuhi, who passed away years earlier. “I was speaking about my aunt, I was speaking about Zehra Fuhi, my father’s cousin, who sadly passed away a few years ago,” he told reporters, attempting to clarify what had quickly become a tangled narrative. The term “Fuhi” means paternal aunt in Urdu and Hindi, but this explanation only added more confusion to his already tarnished statement.
Mamdani’s response also included criticism of his opponents, notably targeting Andrew Cuomo for allegedly focusing on his family story rather than the larger issues at hand. “And for the takeaway for my more than 10-minute address about Islamophobia in this race and in this city to be the question of my aunt tells you everything about Andrew Cuomo and his inability to reckon with a crisis of his own,” he remarked, portraying his critics as deflecting from the core issues of his campaign.
This episode illuminates the precarious nature of Mamdani’s messaging as he navigates the complexities of political discourse. His attempt to leverage personal narratives about family and identity backfired by coupling emotional appeals with inaccuracies. In his effort to engage with the audience and highlight Islamophobia, he ended up with a narrative that was neither coherent nor rooted in fact.
As Mamdani continues in his campaign, this incident serves as a reminder of how public figures can swiftly find themselves grappling with the fallout of their own words when they stray from the truth. For voters, his shifting statements raise questions about his authenticity and integrity as a candidate.
"*" indicates required fields
