The 2024 election cycle is entering a critical phase, with law enforcement agencies preparing for potential unrest. As Election Day approaches on November 5, worries of politically charged violence are rising. The FBI and other agencies highlight a disturbing trend: the likelihood of violence from individual actors and small extremist groups is increasing in the weeks leading up to the election and through the Electoral College voting on December 17.
Agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Homeland Security are working with state and local authorities. Their mission is clear: prevent chaos reminiscent of the January 6 Capitol riots. To this end, the DOJ’s Election Threats Task Force and the FBI’s National Election Command Post are already in operation, sharing critical intelligence and monitoring for threats.
There’s urgency in the air, as NYPD Deputy Commissioner Rebecca Weiner describes the threat landscape as “everything, everywhere, all at once.” The intricate web of disinformation and echo chambers is feeding a dangerous environment. This situation is not merely theoretical; it is grounded in recent incidents. Consider the fires set at ballot drop boxes in the Northwest—acts inspired by unfounded claims of election fraud. These events serve as stark reminders of the environment officials are navigating.
Foreign threats are also a significant concern, as intelligence agencies track attempts by nations such as Russia, China, and Iran to sow discord and undermine trust in U.S. elections. Their tactics often take the form of coordinated social media campaigns that pit Americans against one another, posing severe challenges to the integrity of the electoral process.
In preparation, over 200 training exercises have taken place this year, focusing on everything from cybersecurity breaches to potential violence at polling locations. The FBI’s command center will remain active through December, gathering intelligence from its field offices and relaying it to local agents. An FBI spokesperson noted that the command post’s primary role is to ‘track status reports… and provide guidance to FBI field offices.’ However, they have advised against overt fact-checking during this period to avoid perceptions of bias.
This caution, while well-intentioned, hasn’t eliminated confusion among the public. In fact, misinformation continues to spread, often exacerbated by statements from prominent political figures. Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that the upcoming election could be rigged—statements reminiscent of his rhetoric prior to the 2020 election, which culminated in violence and threats against officials.
The fallout of this environment is already evident. Misinformation regarding issues like immigration and voter fraud is at the forefront. A prime example surfaced during a September 2024 debate when Trump falsely claimed that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were ‘eating locals’ pets.’ This sensational allegation, despite being discredited, went viral. PolitiFact deemed it the 2024 ‘Lie of the Year,’ highlighting a severe lack of credible evidence to back the claims.
The implications of such statements played out rapidly in Springfield, with reports of harassment against Haitian migrants—children were teased and schools were threatened. This chaos can be traced back to Trump’s unfounded claims and their subsequent amplification by others, including Senator J.D. Vance. According to Katie Sanders of PolitiFact, such persistence transforms a misleading tale into a bold-faced lie.
Trump and Vance’s insistence on the validity of their claims illustrates a troubling trend in contemporary politics. Bill Adair, founder of PolitiFact, stated that politicians often weigh the advantages of a lie against the potential repercussions, typically concluding that the benefit outweighs the risk. Between 2016 and 2021, a staggering 55% of fact-checked statements from Republican politicians were deemed false, compared to 31% from their Democratic counterparts. Adair identifies the fragmented media landscape as a significant factor facilitating this trend, noting, ‘Fact-checking is not putting a serious dent in the lies.’
The Springfield incident and its ongoing repercussions underline the tenacity of these false narratives. Social media continues to buzz with references to the pet-eating claim, with some commenters supporting the story and others expressing skepticism—even as the misinformation circulates freely.
For law enforcement and intelligence analysts, the implications of such dynamics are worrying. Inflammatory claims made by leaders can incite real-world actions and violence, all rooted in false narratives. A bulletin from the Department of Homeland Security points out that ‘False narratives surrounding election integrity have previously motivated violent acts, and continue to pose a credible threat heading into November 2024.’
Furthermore, officials are particularly concerned about the ‘lone wolf’ issue—individuals radicalized through online content or fringe media who may take violent action based on unfounded beliefs. Such individuals are challenging to identify, often acting independently and leaving little behind in terms of detectable patterns.
In response to this environment, agencies are calling for increased vigilance while also striving to maintain neutrality in their approach. A former DHS official described the balancing act: ‘Ensuring security without appearing partisan is a high-wire act.’ There is significant pressure not to silence political figures, even when they spread misinformation.
Yet, the damage may already be done. A poignant social media post captures this sentiment: ‘Thanks for doing such a great job keeping track of the government lies, man.’ This reflects a deeper frustration—widespread distrust in institutions and the information they provide.
The stakes for the upcoming election extend beyond just its outcome. It concerns public confidence in the electoral process, the safety of officials and volunteers, and the impact of repeated lies on democratic integrity. With tensions high and the landscape fraught with misinformation, the implications of this election will resonate long after the votes are counted.
"*" indicates required fields
