As Americans prepare for a potential spike in healthcare premiums, the situation surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is becoming increasingly precarious. In 2026, those looking to purchase healthcare through the ACA marketplace are projected to experience a staggering 26% rise in premiums. If government subsidies, which assist in reducing these costs, expire at the end of 2025, some subsidized patients could see their monthly payments soar by 114%, according to a recent analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The looming uncertainty is not just about subsidy extensions. Experts highlight fundamental issues within the ACA itself that contribute to rising costs. Michael Cannon from the Cato Institute critiques the structure of the ACA, stating, “Obamacare does more to increase prices.” He explains how the system disproportionately impacts healthy individuals by forcing them to pay prices that far exceed what they would normally incur. This is a reflection of broader systemic issues that have taken root in the ACA’s design.
At the heart of the ACA are provisions like the guaranteed issue mandate and community rating rules. The guaranteed issue requires insurers to accept all applicants without considering their health status. This rule effectively shifts costs onto younger and healthier individuals, as older patients tend to require more extensive care. Sally Pipes, president of the Pacific Policy Institute, emphasizes this point, noting that “as older patients use a lot more healthcare than the young and cost insurers a lot more in claims, premiums have to rise.”
The community rating rule adds another layer of complexity by preventing insurers from charging older individuals more than three times what they charge younger individuals. Cannon argues that this creates an inequitable pricing structure: “That is a price floor for the healthy person… and it’s a price ceiling for the sick person.” This intertwines the fate of healthy and sick individuals under a system that essentially enforces price controls, driving up costs across the board.
Another significant factor influencing healthcare expenses is the ACA’s essential health benefits requirement. This mandates that all insurance plans cover a defined set of services, including treatments that some consumers may not need or want. Pipes points out that, “If an individual family wants a plan that doesn’t cover alcohol rehabilitation or hair prostheses, they still have to pay to cover these benefits.” This blanket coverage regulation adds to the overall cost of insurance, regardless of personal health needs.
The tumult between Democrats and Republicans over ACA subsidies is directly linked to recent legislative struggles. The recent government shutdown, which lasted over 40 days, underscores the contentious debate over these financial aids. Democrats previously insisted on extending the ACA subsidies but ultimately had to concede to a short-term spending bill that did not include these extensions.
The Biden administration initially introduced these COVID-era subsidies under the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021, with extensions under the Inflation Reduction Act the following year. However, with voices like Trump’s advocating against the continuation of subsidies—stating that Congress should not “waste” time on negotiations—he echoes a sentiment common among critics of the ACA. He emphasized, “The only healthcare I will support or approve is sending the money directly back to the people,” framing the debate around individual empowerment versus government intervention.
In summary, the combination of expiring subsidies and foundational flaws within the ACA creates a challenging landscape for American healthcare. As costs rise and uncertainty looms, the debate around how to best secure affordable healthcare will likely intensify in the coming years.
"*" indicates required fields
