Aftyn Behn, a Democratic congressional candidate in Tennessee, is facing serious challenges as she campaigns for a seat in a deep-red district. In a recent interview, she struggled to clarify her controversial past statements regarding police funding, particularly her former calls to defund the police during the protests sparked by George Floyd’s death. This poses significant problems as her campaign nears a critical election date.
During her appearance on MS Now, Behn was confronted by anchor Catherine Rampell about a series of tweets she posted back in 2020. These tweets included aggressive statements like “dissolve the @MNPDNashville” and a defense of violent protests, referring specifically to the justification of burning police stations. Rampell asked Behn directly whether she still stands by these sentiments. Behn faltered, unable to provide a straightforward answer.
“Do you still stand by those tweets?” asked Rampell, to which Behn hesitated and replied, “Um, I I’m not going to engage in in in uh cable news talking points…” Such an evasion may not resonate well with voters who expect transparency, especially in a conservative district where support for law enforcement is strong.
Behn’s background as a regional organizing director with Indivisible, a group advocating for significant cuts to police funding, further complicates her position. Archived remarks indicate her strong alignment with the “defund the police” movement. At protests, she condemned the police as “institutionally racist” and championed community-based alternatives to traditional policing. Her deleted tweets, including one expressing solidarity with those who believe burning down police stations was justified, now haunt her campaign.
Even when faced with her past, Behn refused to address her former statements directly. “I’m here to talk about my race, which is in uh literally nine days,” she insisted, attempting to pivot to broader economic concerns like healthcare and affordability. Such tactics may frustrate the interviewer and alienate potential voters seeking a candidate unafraid to take responsibility for their beliefs.
This issue is heightened by the political landscape of Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, which leans heavily Republican. Former President Donald Trump secured over a 22-point victory here, making it a challenging battleground for Behn. Her opponent, Matt Van Epps, has seized upon her past, labeling her as “anti-law enforcement,” which plays into the fears of voters prioritizing safety and support for police.
As Republicans capitalize on this moment, the implications for Behn’s campaign become clearer. Her inability to distance herself from previous proposals may lead to her downfall. Republican strategist Matt Gorman noted that her evasiveness reinforces suspicions among voters about her true beliefs. “She’s trying to run from her record because she knows it won’t play outside the progressive bubble,” he remarked, highlighting the disconnect between her past activism and current campaign strategy.
Meanwhile, Behn’s financial backing tells a different story. Her campaign raised substantial funds—over $700,000 in the third quarter—showing significant interest, mainly from outside the state. Yet, as political experts have noted, her failure to address her history may alienate swing voters essential for her success in an area where traditional values prevail.
The ongoing national debate regarding police funding significantly influences voter opinions. A Pew Research survey indicates that a vast majority of Americans oppose reducing police budgets, with cities that attempted such cuts reversing course in light of rising crime. Behn’s past advocacy in this contentious arena may paint her as out of step with local sentiments, complicating her efforts to be seen as a pragmatic candidate focused on economic issues.
Her past comments, particularly those expressing disdain for Nashville, have also resurfaced, adding to her challenges. Behn’s earlier remarks about hating aspects of the city create a perception problem among locals who might question her commitment to the community they cherish, raising doubts about her sincerity.
The core issue is Behn’s contradictory narrative. She attempts to position herself as a moderate while her previous calls for drastic change linger like a dark cloud. Voter trust hinges on whether she can convincingly separate her past activist rhetoric from her current political ambitions.
As Behn prepares for the final stretch before the December 2 special election, the stakes are high. Voters must weigh her economic arguments against the backdrop of past controversies. Whether they will be swayed by her plans for the future or remain wary of her radical past could very well determine the outcome of her campaign.
"*" indicates required fields
