The situation at the U.S. southern border has reached a critical juncture, drawing intense scrutiny of President Biden’s focus on treating illegal immigrants rather than addressing the escalating security crisis. Commentator Collin Rugg expressed the frustration felt by many: “Humanely? Maybe he ought to concentrate on other countries.” This sentiment resonates with Americans concerned about the government’s handling of illegal immigration amid record border crossings.
Data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection reveals a troubling trend. Fiscal year 2023 recorded over 2.4 million encounters at the border, a new peak that surpasses previous years. In comparison, 2.3 million crossings occurred in 2022 and 1.7 million in 2021. Since the Biden administration took office, these figures have far outstripped those prior to 2021, indicating a persistent crisis.
The Biden administration has consistently promoted concepts of “humane” immigration enforcement. The president’s vision emphasizes “a fair, orderly, and humane system.” Initiatives such as halting border wall construction, reinstating catch-and-release policies, and narrowing enforcement priorities indicate a shift toward a softer approach. Critics contend that these policies erode deterrence and suggest to potential migrants that illegal entry poses minimal risk.
Many migrants are now released into the U.S. while awaiting immigration hearings, which can often take years due to lengthy backlogs. A Border Patrol agent, speaking anonymously, stated, “We’re not managing the border. We’re processing people into the interior. That’s not fighting illegal immigration—that’s accommodating it.” This viewpoint reflects a growing discontent within enforcement circles regarding the current policies.
Tom Homan, former acting ICE Director, reinforced this sentiment during testimony. He stated, “You don’t help migrants by incentivizing illegal crossings. You expose them to cartels, exploitation, and abuse.” Homan argued that humane policies should secure the border and discourage illegal entry, contrasting sharply with the administration’s approach.
Other countries grappling with migration issues, such as Australia and Hungary, have implemented strict border enforcement policies that have successfully reduced illegal crossings. Even the United Kingdom has taken significant actions, like deportation agreements and offshore processing plans, demonstrating that deterrence can be effective. In contrast, the U.S.’s focus on processing and equity appears less impactful as the flow of migrants continues unabated.
The surge includes individuals from various countries beyond Mexico, with migrants arriving from Venezuela, Honduras, Guatemala, Haiti, and even distant nations such as China and India. The sheer number of nationalities represented among those crossing the border—over 170 in FY 2023—underscores the global nature of this crisis. Texas Senator John Cornyn emphasized, “This is no longer just a regional crisis. It’s global.” He criticized the administration’s preoccupation with “processing” over security.
While the Department of Homeland Security defends its actions as lawful and responsive to humanitarian needs, significant drops in illegal entries remain elusive. A notable public shift in sentiment has emerged, particularly among independents and older Americans. A March 2024 Pew Research poll indicated that 69% of respondents rated the government’s performance on illegal immigration as “poor,” with a staggering 74% disapproving among those aged 50 and older.
As a result, the implications of this waning public trust could reverberate politically. Some border-state Democrats, facing challenging reelection prospects, have distanced themselves from the White House. Representative Henry Cuellar remarked, “continued inaction on border security will cost us politically—and endanger our communities.” This statement reflects the broader concerns of constituents who feel the pressure of inadequate border management.
Border communities are straining under the weight of this ongoing influx. Cities such as New York, Chicago, and Denver report shortages in shelters and overwhelmed healthcare systems. New York City officials noted over 140,000 migrants passed through their shelter system within a year, prompting Mayor Eric Adams to label the current situation as “unsustainable.” His call for increased federal support also includes a demand for a reexamination of immigration enforcement strategies.
The Biden administration’s attempts to frame its policies in humanitarian terms have not quelled critics or alleviated the crisis. The risk is that this rhetoric unintentionally fuels perceptions that the government prioritizes the treatment of illegal entrants over preventing unlawful entry. A former DHS advisor highlighted the disconnect: “You’ve got unprecedented numbers, overstretched border agents, and cities cracking at the seams. But the talking point remains ‘we’re processing people humanely.’” This perspective underscores a pivotal principle of law enforcement—preventing crime before it occurs.
As the 2024 election nears, immigration remains a key issue for voters. The Biden administration’s choice between compassionate framing and a tougher enforcement stance will significantly shape public opinion and the country’s ability to regain control over its borders. The rising numbers and ongoing frustrations are palpable, as one voter reflected the growing sentiment: “Humanely? Maybe he ought to concentrate on other countries.”
"*" indicates required fields
