President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign is facing serious hurdles in Michigan as discontent grows among key Arab and Palestinian American leaders regarding his administration’s response to the Israel-Hamas conflict. The backlash has led Biden’s campaign manager, Julie Chavez Rodriguez, to engage in closed-door meetings with community representatives—an unusual tactic that underscores urgent electoral concerns in this pivotal swing state.
During a recent meeting, Chavez Rodriguez gathered local Arab and Palestinian American leaders in Michigan, including Osama Siblani, publisher of the Arab American News, and Assad Turfe, deputy Wayne County executive. The mood was somber, reflecting the anger and sorrow that many in the community feel over the humanitarian situation in Gaza, which has seen over 26,000 deaths since October 7, as reported by the Hamas-run health ministry.
This conflict has ignited tensions within the Democratic base, particularly among Muslim and Arab Americans in cities like Dearborn. Many residents have family affected by the violence, prompting a reassessment of their loyalty to Biden as he gears up for a difficult 2024 rematch. Once a solid voting bloc, they are now questioning their continued support.
Turfe expressed the gravity of the situation directly. “There’s 30,000 dead people. 50% of the population is living in hunger. There’s no functioning hospitals,” he stated, calling for a ceasefire. His remarks underscored the need for leadership amid a mounting crisis. “At the end of the day, people look at us as leaders, and we’ve got to make a leadership decision,” he added, highlighting the community’s expectation for action.
The fallout from these meetings has already garnered national attention. Conservative commentator Collin Rugg reflected on the implications in a tweet, hinting that Trump’s chances might increase as Biden’s support base fractures in battleground states like Michigan. His observation points to a concern that Biden’s foreign policy choices are alienating essential voters.
Trump has seized the opportunity, recalling his administration’s foreign policy achievements, such as the Abraham Accords, while contrasting them with what many perceive as Biden’s inadequacies. “The world was at peace, America was prospering. I made big promises… and I kept my promises,” he claimed, suggesting that his tenure fostered stability that resonates with those now disillusioned with the current administration’s stance.
The electoral implications of this discontent could be substantial. In 2020, Arab and Muslim American communities in Michigan played a crucial role in Biden’s victory. With more than 250,000 Muslims residing in the state, according to Pew Research, their support is a key factor. A 2016 poll by the Arab American Institute found that a significant majority—59%—identified as Democrats. Yet recent sentiments hint this allegiance may be shifting.
The frustration isn’t limited to political policy; it touches on deeper issues of trust and connection with a party that many have felt supported their interests. Civic organizations advocating for Arab and Muslim Americans have criticized the Biden administration for its military support of Israel and for lacking significant humanitarian efforts in Gaza.
Attempts to mend these relationships appear to be faltering. While Chavez Rodriguez intended to foster dialogue, the feedback was overwhelmingly critical. “There was no attempt to sugarcoat the feelings in the room,” a source familiar with the meetings indicated. This reflection reveals a community in considerable pain and frustration.
Biden’s campaign strategy is caught in a tight spot. Balancing ties with pro-Israel constituents while trying to maintain the support of Arab and Muslim voters creates a precarious situation. The absence of a decisive humanitarian response after 111 days of conflict has only exacerbated the dissatisfaction. As Turfe pointed out, “111 days to call for a ceasefire—and there’s still silence.”
The stakes are high. In swing states like Michigan, low voter turnout can be as harmful as voters switching allegiance. The narrow margins of past elections illustrate this risk: Trump won Michigan by just over 10,000 votes in 2016, while Biden’s lead in 2020 was about 154,000. Even modest changes in turnout among Arab American voters could significantly alter the outcome.
Amidst this landscape, Trump advances a contrasting narrative, highlighting achievements during his term, including lowered poverty and military accomplishments. He often points to swiftly defeating the ISIS caliphate. While detractors may dispute these claims, they resonate with many who see a stark difference in stability and strength between the past administration and the current one.
Biden’s path forward is fraught with challenges. Despite efforts to unify fragmented communities, the administration faces pointed reminders of unmet expectations. Without a prompt and effective adjustment, the risk extends beyond merely losing the Arab American vote; it could also lead to a swing state slipping away to Trump.
No official statement has emerged from the Biden campaign regarding the meetings in Michigan. However, the atmosphere among those who attended is unmistakable.
As Siblani articulated, “We’re not asking for politics—we’re asking for humanity.” The coming months will reveal whether Biden can regain the trust of a disillusioned base or if this rift will deepen, becoming a significant fault line in the approaching election.
"*" indicates required fields
