Recent comments from former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell have unveiled a troubling reality for Europe’s political elite. He openly declared that under Donald Trump’s leadership, the United States can no longer be considered an ally of Europe. Borrell’s remarks expose a deep-seated anxiety within the EU, highlighting their deteriorating influence on the global stage, especially regarding pivotal issues like the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Borrell’s outburst came after the United States took direct action regarding a proposed peace plan for Ukraine without consulting European leaders. This decision left EU officials feeling sidelined and furious, as they perceived themselves as crucial power brokers in international relations. However, the reality is far from their self-image. Trump’s approach has effectively bypassed these leaders, cutting to the heart of their insecurities about their diminishing relevance.
Trump’s 28-point peace plan reportedly requires Ukraine to forgo NATO membership, accept frozen conflict lines, and maintain its military at a capped troop level. Perhaps more strikingly, it signals a shift in U.S. policy that does not accommodate the EU’s previous long-term ambitions or appeasement strategies on issues like military spending, tariffs, and energy policy. Such decisive American action has rattled Europe’s technocrats, who have spent years alienating segments of their populations while advancing a globalist agenda.
Borrell’s frustration became evident when he tweeted about the plan, describing it as a “failure” of EU strategy. He stated that Trump’s actions reveal a fundamental shift: “With the 28-point plan to end the war in Ukraine, Trump’s United States can no longer be considered an ally of Europe, which is not even consulted on matters affecting its own security.” This admission underscores the EU’s realization of its waning grip over key geopolitical matters.
The response from Western European capitals was predictable. Countries like the UK, France, and Germany quickly attempted to negotiate their own terms, seeking to maintain EU influence while toughening conditions against Russia. However, this move only seemed to highlight the disconnect between European aspirations and the unfolding realities on the ground. Reports indicate that Ukraine has signaled a broader acceptance of the U.S. plan, a development that risks further isolating Europe in its attempts to steer the conflict in a different direction.
Meanwhile, Russia has positioned itself as a willing participant in discussions, considering the American draft a potential basis for talks. The Kremlin has dismissed the EU’s counterproposal as “unconstructive,” effectively sidelining Brussels even further. Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s Foreign Minister, indicated a readiness to negotiate but emphasized that fundamental principles established by President Putin must remain unaltered.
What this entire scenario reveals is a stark contrast between the realities of international politics and the narratives pushed by the EU’s ruling class. As Kyiv engages with the U.S. and begins to align more closely with American interests, Europe’s old guard finds itself enflamed with anger and frustration. Their strategy has not only failed to convert Trump into an ally but also allowed him to lead the peace dialogue in a manner that threatens to undermine their authority.
Ultimately, Borrell’s candid remarks are less about U.S.-EU relations and more about the growing irrelevance of Europe’s political elite. They expose the fragility of an establishment that has alienated substantial segments of its population while trying to pursue an impractical and overly ambitious agenda. As Trump reshapes the framework for peace in Ukraine, Europe must confront a harsh truth: their influence is fading, and how they respond to this crisis will significantly determine their future role on the global stage.
"*" indicates required fields
