Brian Harpole, Charlie Kirk’s former head of security, recently addressed unsettling rumors that arose following Kirk’s assassination in September. Speculation suggested that two members of Kirk’s security team were using hand signals moments before the attack by a pro-trans activist in Utah. This led to discussions about whether the guards had prior knowledge of the incident.
In a recent appearance on Shawn Ryan’s podcast, Harpole dismissed these claims. He was clear and direct in his explanation, noting that his team relies on effective communication methods, especially during critical situations. “If we needed to relay a message, then we’d do it on comms; if we notice something, we’re not gonna use a hand signal,” he stated.
Harpole’s remarks reflect a strong understanding of security protocols. He emphasized the importance of definitive communication among the team. According to him, any signal used would be unmistakable, saying, “They’re definitive, so can’t be confused with a guy scratching his a**.” This comment underscores his commitment to clarity and precision in high-stakes environments.
Harpole further elaborated on team dynamics, asserting that if someone on his team was to signal others, it would be apparent to him and would not go unnoticed. “It’s not good communication,” he remarked, highlighting his expertise in handling tumultuous situations where misinformation can easily escalate.
Adding to his rebuttal, Harpole expressed confusion over social media reactions that targeted Frank Turek, a member of Kirk’s security team, after he adjusted his hat. “It’s like, okay, substantiate,” Harpole stated. “So he touched his hat… There were a line of people in the front and other people that did all kind of things; everybody’s subject to that.” This part of his commentary illustrates the absurdity of making assumptions based solely on casual gestures in a crowded and chaotic environment.
Harpole’s insights offer a sobering perspective on how misinformation can spread rapidly, especially in the age of social media. His emphasis on established communication methods serves as a reminder of the rigorous protocols followed by security personnel in such volatile settings. In the end, the focus should remain on the facts rather than baseless theories that can cloud the tragic reality of the event.
"*" indicates required fields
