President Nayib Bukele’s approach to transforming El Salvador has garnered attention on the global stage, particularly for its focus on reducing gang violence and fostering economic reform. His recent tweet, stating, “The United States needs to adopt this strategy,” highlights a growing belief that U.S. leaders might find valuable lessons in his governance.
Since taking office in 2019, Bukele reshaped the country’s political dynamics through his New Ideas party, achieving a legislative supermajority in early 2021. This consolidation of power has allowed Bukele to implement sweeping reforms, which include replacing Supreme Court magistrates and changing laws to permit presidential re-election. Critics may raise eyebrows at such power grabs, but Bukele argues he is restoring order in a country historically plagued by instability.
Perhaps the most notable aspect of his administration has been his aggressive stance on crime. Following a surge in gang violence in March 2022, Bukele declared a state of exception, leading to the suspension of certain constitutional rights and facilitating mass arrests. Under this policy, more than 70,000 suspected gang members have been detained, and homicide rates have dropped dramatically—from one of the highest in the world to a mere fraction of that over a few years. While this has led to significant public support, there are real concerns about due process and civil liberties being sidelined.
“After decades of violence, for once we feel safe,” a resident of San Salvador expressed, demonstrating the shifting public sentiment. This sense of newfound safety is a cornerstone of Bukele’s appeal, as many citizens now see a marked contrast to previous administrations that struggled against rampant crime.
Bukele’s re-election victory of 84.7% underscores his popularity, even as international observers noted discrepancies in the electoral process. His underlying message—that stability and order are paramount—resonates deeply in a nation that has seen much upheaval. “This is the first government that’s actually getting things done,” he asserted, reflecting his administration’s focus on concrete results.
Interest in Bukele’s tactics has trickled into discussions within the United States, where cities grapple with their own crime issues. His assertion on social media that the U.S. should replicate his strategy reflects a growing discourse on the effectiveness of hardline tactics. Despite ongoing tensions with the Biden administration regarding democratic principles, several American lawmakers have voiced their support for his decisive actions. One remarked, “How do we criticize success?” The effectiveness of Bukele’s methods complicates traditional responses to governance-related aid.
Though tangible results have emerged, they come with significant costs—both in terms of civil liberties and the reality of overcrowded prisons. Reports of arbitrary detentions haunt the conversation around Bukele’s crackdown, with thousands released after arrest without clear evidence of wrongdoing. While the government claims to be steering El Salvador toward development, critics argue that it cannot overlook the issues of due process in the quest for safety.
Bukele’s economic vision is also a significant aspect of his governance. By making Bitcoin legal tender in 2021, he aimed to bring financial inclusion to a country where only a fraction of the population had bank accounts. This move, however, invoked mixed reactions. Market volatility and a poorly understood cryptocurrency have made the initiative rocky, with only a small number of businesses adopting Bitcoin by 2022 and many citizens remaining skeptical.
The ambitious plan for a “Bitcoin City,” backed by geothermal power and innovative financing options, epitomizes Bukele’s willingness to embrace risk. Yet, critics note the need for foundational infrastructure to bolster such ambitions. By 2025, as external pressures mounted, Bukele scaled back Bitcoin’s official status, reflecting the challenge of balancing innovative aspirations with fiscal responsibility.
What remains clear is that Bukele’s journey evokes strong sentiments—where some see a shift toward effective governance, others perceive alarming authoritarianism. His administration is marked by an emphasis on results, blending elements of nationalism, populism, and unconventional methods that disrupt established norms.
As conditions change in the U.S., including reduced Salvadoran migration largely due to improvements in safety at home, the question for lawmakers becomes more complex. The implications of Bukele’s model resonate within the corridors of Washington, given the historical ties between U.S. aid and governance reforms in Central American nations.
With many Salvadorans still reliant on remittances from the U.S., developments in El Salvador continue to be watched closely. The underlying question evolves from whether Bukele’s methods are traditional or acceptably democratic, to whether they produce effective change. As the nation undergoes substantial transformation under Bukele’s vision, the suggestion to borrow from his strategy gains traction—prompting serious contemplation about what change can and should look like in the American context.
"*" indicates required fields
