California is grappling with a budget crisis of massive proportions. The projected $17.7 billion deficit for fiscal year 2024-25 contrasts sharply with Governor Gavin Newsom’s commitment to pour billions into healthcare for undocumented immigrants. This decision has triggered a storm of criticism from fiscal conservatives and policy advocates, who question the wisdom of such spending in light of the state’s financial situation.
California has pledged around $13 billion to extend Medi-Cal benefits to residents without legal immigration status. This includes support for 1.6 million undocumented adults already enrolled in the program. Coverage has expanded significantly in recent years, now including individuals aged 26 to 49—an age group previously excluded. The expansion raises eyebrows as the state continues to face substantial budget cuts elsewhere.
One viral tweet highlighted the contradiction: “🚨 HOLY CRAP! It’s been revealed that Gavin Newsom’s California is running an $18 billion budget deficit…yet spends $13 BILLION DOLLARS on illegal alien healthcare 🤯.” It captures the frustration of many who wonder about the logic of prioritizing benefits for those living in the state unlawfully while neglecting pressing fiscal issues.
Senator Roger Niello, a Republican from Roseville, expressed this sentiment directly: “We committed spending to something we can’t afford, and now we’re going back to the taxpayers asking them to fix it.” His remarks underscore a growing concern that California’s fiscal commitments are outpacing its revenue.
The expansion of Medi-Cal represents a significant shift in policy, pushing state liabilities to new heights. The program first covered undocumented children in 2015, expanded to those under 26 in 2020, and has now grown to include almost all undocumented adults up to age 49. This rapid increase in eligibility has led to sharp cost spikes and a projected $6.2 billion shortfall this year alone.
Recognizing these challenges, Newsom has proposed holding new enrollments for undocumented adults by 2026 and implementing a $100 monthly premium for individuals with “unsatisfactory immigration status” starting in 2027. However, negotiations reduced this premium to $30 and postponed some cuts, leaving the core elements of the plan largely intact.
During the budget announcement, Newsom framed the proposal as a cap rather than a cut. “We’re not cutting or rolling back those enrolled in our Medi-Cal system. We’re just capping it,” he stated, attempting to juggle fiscal reality with the state’s health access goals.
Yet even among Democrats, there is recognition of the fiscal strain. Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel noted that the current fiscal outlook presents significant challenges ahead. The Legislative Analyst’s Office warns the budget deficit could swell to $35 billion by 2027-28 unless spending is curbed, particularly in health and social services.
The crisis has multiple contributing factors. Despite a small revenue uptick in 2023, with an extra $6 billion in state income largely dedicated to schools and reserves, these funds cannot alleviate the general fund’s shortfall. Rising healthcare expenses, driven by higher pharmaceutical prices and reduced federal assistance, further complicate the landscape. Federal Medicaid changes may escalate state costs by $1.3 billion next year and could reach up to $5 billion annually by 2029-30, according to the LAO.
Critics view these pressures as an urgent call to reassess current programs. “We’re digging ourselves deeper with each year of these expanded entitlements,” Niello warned, emphasizing the need to refocus on services for California residents.
The discourse within the Democratic camp is fractious. Senator Lena Gonzalez, a Democrat and co-chair of the Latino Legislative Caucus, firmly opposed any proposed cuts to immigrant healthcare, stating, “Absolutely I’m opposed to what is being put forward right now… This is really stark.” There is a palpable tension between the desire to uphold health equity ideals and the challenging fiscal realities at play.
Advocates have echoed similar frustrations. Amanda McAllister-Wallner from Health Access California called the proposed cuts “reckless and unconscionable,” a betrayal of commitments made to immigrant communities. Yet the stark numbers reveal that, without intervention, many of the 1.6 million undocumented enrolled in Medi-Cal could face significant loss of benefits or new fees. An estimated 112,000 individuals might lose coverage entirely by 2027 due to the enrollment freezes and stringent asset testing, which is set at $130,000 per person.
This budget crisis is not limited to healthcare alone; California’s general fund is strained by climbing costs in housing, homelessness services, and climate initiatives. The state recently cut homelessness funding by half, from $1 billion to $500 million, prompting warnings from Graham Knaus, executive director of the California State Association of Counties: “These reductions put our most vulnerable residents at even greater risk.”
Compounding the crisis, California has decided to postpone any tax hikes or significant reforms until at least 2027. The governor has initiated plans for the Legislative Analyst’s Office to develop potential revenue strategies, including taxes on major employers. But these discussions will not take place until later this year, forcing the state to rely on cuts, freezes, and borrowing for now.
Senator Caroline Menjivar, a critical voice from within the Democratic Party, accused the governor of yielding to conservative pressures while preserving tax incentives for corporations. “The Governor says freezing enrollment and instating Medi-Cal premiums are not tactics to keep people off the program,” Menjivar pointed out. “But isn’t that the obvious consequence?”
The final budget agreement, signed in June, implements a freeze on Medi-Cal enrollment for undocumented adults starting in 2026, with premiums scheduled to begin in 2027. While some funding for culturally competent public health services remains, adult dental benefits will be eliminated under the same plan.
Despite the political and ethical considerations, for many taxpayers, the issue is uncomplicated: California is deep in debt, yet it continues to allocate significant funds for healthcare for those living in the country illegally. This situation raises serious questions about Newsom’s national leadership aspirations, as discontent grows among his constituents. Public reaction, as reflected in the viral tweet, indicates a possible turning point: “Utter and complete betrayal. GAVIN CAN NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT.”
With financial realities shaping the narrative, it remains clear that the stakes are high, and the impacts of these decisions will be felt far beyond California’s borders.
"*" indicates required fields
