Conservatives are honing in on a member of the House Democratic Caucus, aiming to hold her accountable for her associations with Jeffrey Epstein. House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, representing Maryland, announced plans for a resolution to censure Del. Stacey Plaskett, the Virgin Islands’ nonvoting delegate to the House. Newly unearthed documents reveal that Plaskett was in contact with Epstein during a significant congressional hearing back in February 2019 featuring Michael Cohen, a former associate of Donald Trump.
Harris addressed the media, stating, “I think we’re going to have a censure resolution on Delegate Plaskett. It could be introduced today.” He made it clear that he believes her actions warrant severe consequences. “I think she needs to be censured by the House and removed from the [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] for colluding with a convicted felon during a congressional hearing. That does not reflect well on the House of Representatives,” he added.
The specifics of how the resolution will be raised remain murky. It is uncertain whether it will be a standard bill or categorized as a “privileged” resolution, which would compel House GOP leaders to address it swiftly. If classified as privileged, the House could potentially deliberate on it within mere days.
In this politically charged environment, Republicans have latched onto the texts between Plaskett and Epstein, asserting that the situation highlights a double standard among Democrats regarding the late financier’s controversial legacy. While House Democrats have rallied behind calls for transparency, particularly regarding any links between Trump and Epstein, the silence surrounding Plaskett’s communications has been notably deafening.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is instrumental in leading his party, carefully sidestepped inquiries about Plaskett following a recent news conference. When pressed by reporters, he replied, “I have not had a conversation with Stacey Plaskett. In fact, I think Stacey Plaskett has issued a statement as it relates to this and her statement speaks for itself.”
The texts in question came to light during a congressional hearing where Cohen accused Trump of orchestrating payments to silence alleged mistresses from the 2016 campaign. These messages indicate that Epstein was interested in how Plaskett conducted her questioning. For instance, one message revealed that Epstein urged Plaskett, saying, “He’s opened the door to questions re who are the other henchmen at trump org.” Plaskett responded, acknowledging his guidance, saying, “Yup. Very aware and waiting my turn.”
In light of these revelations, Plaskett’s office released a statement to the Washington Post, clarifying her position. It emphasized that Plaskett received numerous messages from diverse sources—staff, constituents, and the public—some of which were supportive, while others were antagonistic, including those from Epstein. Her office asserted, “As a former prosecutor, she welcomes information that helps her get at the truth and took on the GOP that was trying to bury the truth.” Furthermore, it highlighted her longstanding efforts against sexual assault and human trafficking, asserting her disgust for Epstein’s behavior and her dedication to supporting his victims.
The tension surrounding Plaskett’s situation reflects a larger, ongoing narrative as Republicans strive to navigate the sensitive realities of the Epstein case. As new details emerge and the House returns from recess, the implications of this conflict could resonate throughout political discussions, keeping all eyes on how the resolution unfolds and how Democrats respond to the scrutiny. Harris’s threat of censure presents a tangible example of the contentious atmosphere, illustrating how allegations and past connections can swiftly reshape political alliances and strategies in Washington.
"*" indicates required fields
