Columbia University is currently at the center of a significant national debate regarding antisemitism on campus. A vocal group of students has sparked concern, leading many to question the expectations of elite institutions versus the reality unfolding within their walls. This tension was poignantly highlighted in a tweet from commentator @atensnut: “I have a hard time believing someone who sounds like that is a student at Columbia.” Such skepticism reflects broader anxieties about how higher education environments are handling issues of identity and discrimination.
On May 18, over 500 Jewish students made their voices heard by publishing an open letter condemning what they describe as escalating hostility against their community amidst an uptick in anti-Israel protests. Their letter is significant, as it represents the collective stance of more than 540 Jewish undergraduates and graduates who assert their right to exist as Zionists and to express their beliefs without facing intimidation. They stated, “We are targeted for our belief that Israel, the world’s only Jewish state, has a right to exist.” This assertion is crucial as it addresses not only their faith but also their cultural and national identity.
The backdrop of their written response reveals a grim reality: chants such as “We don’t want no Zionists here” and the disturbing sentiment that “the Holocaust wasn’t special” laid bare the dehumanization and threats faced by Jewish students. Their intention in releasing the letter was clear: to reclaim their narrative and establish that they wouldn’t allow more extreme voices to dictate their experience or identity.
Columbia’s notoriety regarding antisemitism has intensified following the attacks by Hamas on October 7, 2023. Since then, anti-Israel activism has surged on campus, leading to frequent protests, including significant demonstrations and prolonged buildups demanding action from the university. These events were prominently organized by groups such as Columbia University Apartheid Divest and Students for Justice in Palestine. The atmosphere created by these protests has resonated with many, igniting a discourse on the nature of campus activism and its impact on the student body.
More than just community concerns, the implications of this unrest led to scrutiny from federal agencies. A U.S. Department of Education report from 2025 found Columbia in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, citing a “deliberate indifference” to severe antisemitic harassment that denied students access to a safe educational environment. Specific instances were alarming, including the appearance of swastikas and public demonstrations calling for violence against Jews.
Many Jewish students now report heightened anxiety and a palpable fear regarding their safety and expression in various campus settings. One law student recounted witnessing peers remove religious symbols like kippahs and suppress promotional materials celebrating Jewish culture. The disruptions included religious services, leaving students feeling compelled to alter their routines and spaces to safeguard themselves from hostility.
The fallout from these incidents led to the resignation of University President Minouche Shafik in August 2024 and her successor’s eventual departure in early 2025. The criticism from both Jewish advocacy groups and members of Congress underscored a collective discontent regarding the administration’s handling of antisemitism. The focus on securing students’ rights and dignity is a significant chapter in understanding how educational leaders are grappling with these challenges.
It’s noteworthy that even organizations committed to free speech, such as the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), faced challenges aligning Columbia’s policies with the realities on the ground. The apparent inconsistency—allowing hostility toward Jewish students while enforcing strict guidelines against other forms of discrimination—raises troubling questions about the educational environment.
National figures, including investor Bill Ackman and Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, have voiced their concerns. Erdan’s remarks at a Holocaust Remembrance event drew a stark comparison, linking contemporary campus actions to the harrowing events of pre-WWII Germany. His comments served as a call for increased awareness and accountability in how universities address these pressing issues.
Outside of Columbia, alumni and external Jewish organizations organized protests, further complicating the narrative. The authors of the May 18 letter emphasized that these outsiders do not accurately represent their views. Junior Eliana Goldin stated, “People have been speaking in our name to the news and saying, ‘This is what the Jews on campus believe,’ and it’s really not the case.” This push for self-representation is a powerful reminder of the need for diverse voices within any community, particularly in times of crisis.
Support for Israel was clearly articulated in their letter, which countered anti-Zionist narratives that misrepresented Jewish students’ perspectives. The authors reaffirmed that their support for Israel is a cornerstone of their identity, not an afterthought. This is not merely a rhetorical position but reflects growing national statistics indicating a troubling increase in antisemitic incidents. The Anti-Defamation League reported over 8,800 cases in 2023, a staggering increase, with universities notably among the locations witnessing such hostility.
The engagement in dialogue and expression through the May 18 letter aimed to hold the university administration accountable for its leniency towards antisemitic incidents. Reports from federal agencies indicated that Columbia’s responses to concerns were insufficient, often leaving cases unresolved and Jewish identifiers vulnerable to hostility.
The clarity with which the Jewish students detailed instances of antisemitism—from graffiti to verbal abuse—serves as a historical record of their experiences. With over 500 students stepping forward, they made it evident that if they did not speak up, others would continue to misrepresent their beliefs and experiences. Their letter garnered widespread attention, not just as a protest but as a crucial document of their reality.
But as cynics like @atensnut highlight, there remains a skepticism about the authenticity of scholar-student dynamics at Columbia. When activist rhetoric overshadows genuine experiences and leaders fail to advocate for all students, the atmosphere fosters disbelief and frustration among observers. Ultimately, the ongoing situation prompts a challenging inquiry about whether Columbia University is committed to listening to all its students, or if it continues to ignore the realities faced by its Jewish community.
"*" indicates required fields
