In the ongoing dialogue about artificial intelligence, Democrats in Washington are missing the mark. They are not wrong to worry about the risks associated with AI, but they have yet to present a compelling vision for the economic transformation that lies ahead. While one side discusses building a fruitful future, the other focuses on constraining progress. This divergence was evident at the recent Nvidia GTC conference in Washington, where technologists and business leaders celebrated the achievements of Jensen Huang and Nvidia. The attendees praised President Donald Trump for fostering an environment conducive to AI development. They saw an administration that aims to remove barriers and boost American competitiveness—a stark contrast to the current Democratic approach.
Democrats have been vocal about the safety concerns, biases, and job market effects of AI, but their treatment of these issues has been somewhat fragmented. They address these as isolated problems rather than interconnected facets of a more profound query: how can this transformation be harnessed to create broad opportunities, as opposed to merely generating profits for a select few? This is the essential conversation that the American public deserves.
At the heart of the current elite consensus is a singular goal: optimizing AI capabilities across the board. A recent essay in Foreign Affairs by former Biden administration officials exemplifies the “grand bargain” that exists between government and big tech companies. It proposes expanding infrastructure for major corporations while neglecting the interests of workers and communities. This approach has proven ineffective in the past, yet many Republicans and Democrats accept it. The long-term consequences are clear: large enterprises poised to capture significant wealth while worker displacement is treated as a secondary issue.
Furthermore, the Biden administration’s recent executive order may have been thorough in addressing safety testing, but it notably failed to discuss the prosperity of workers and their communities. Historically, waves of automation have left communities diminished and workers without viable career paths. As new technology is introduced, it’s crucial to incorporate strategies aimed at strengthening local economies and ensuring that opportunities are not just a privilege for a few.
Polling trends in swing states highlight a growing skepticism toward AI as workers associate the technology with job insecurity. This skepticism transcends political boundaries. On the far right, figures like former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon have cautioned that AI could obliterate entry-level jobs. Meanwhile, on the left, Democratic Socialists view AI as merely a mechanism for amplifying corporate power. Both perspectives neglect the possibility that AI could distribute benefits widely rather than concentrate wealth.
Contrastingly, a more promising vision would prioritize the flourishing of American workers, families, and innovative startups. The long-term prosperity of large companies is intrinsically linked to the health of this foundational layer. This isn’t about decelerating progress; the momentum of capital is swift. The focus should instead be on structuring this rapid growth to foster shared prosperity rather than facilitating concentrated extraction. Hasty progress without a plan could instigate political backlash, jeopardizing the advancements made. Conversely, strategic speed can lead to sustainable growth.
Historical precedents support this approach. Initiatives like land-grant universities and rural electrification programs ensured community involvement in research and technology. The GI Bill empowered veterans to secure meaningful careers. The Alaska Permanent Fund provides residents dividends from oil revenue, exemplifying a model where local communities benefit directly from shared resources.
Imagine a future where national block grants empower states to establish public compute resources for startups. Envision worker transition funds that allow individuals to control their pathways rather than endure bureaucratic programs. Consider policies that provide equity stakes enabling communities to share in the benefits derived from public infrastructure. These proposals can foster essential conversations with the American populace.
The time has come for a national initiative that embodies American innovation and ingenuity. Democrats have a proud legacy of promoting broad access to resources, as seen with rural electrification and railroad policies. Arizona’s Senator Mark Kelly’s “AI for America” proposal reflects the kind of expansive vision worthy of public discourse.
As anxiety mounts among populists across the political spectrum, the pressing question remains: Will either party confront the elite consensus that dismisses the implications of economic transformation on workers and communities? This moment calls for a vision that encompasses all Americans, with particular emphasis on workers, communities, and vital startup entrepreneurs.
"*" indicates required fields
