Former Vice President Dick Cheney’s death at 84 marks the end of a significant era in U.S. politics. His influence shaped national security policies for decades, and the reactions to his passing expose deeper divisions within American political life.
Cheney’s passing was announced on June 4, 2024. He succumbed to complications from pneumonia coupled with ongoing cardiac and vascular issues. Serving as Vice President under George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009, Cheney became a pivotal figure, particularly in the wake of the September 11 attacks. His role transformed public discourse around national security and civil liberties.
The political responses to Cheney’s death reflect his complicated legacy. Current figures from both parties acknowledged his contributions. Kamala Harris noted, “His passing marks the loss of a figure who, with a strong sense of dedication, gave so much of his life to the country he loved.” Biden echoed similar sentiments, stating, “Dick Cheney devoted his life to public service. While we didn’t agree on much, he believed, as I do, that family is the beginning, middle, and end.” These statements highlight the duality of Cheney’s character: a dedicated public servant whose policies ignited passionate debate.
However, Cheney’s death has reopened wounds within the Republican Party, particularly between the establishment and the Trump-led populist faction. Remarkably, Trump and Vice President JD Vance refrained from commenting on Cheney’s passing, a silence that contrasts their previous criticism of him. In 2011, Trump declared, “I didn’t like Cheney when he was Vice President. I don’t like him now.” This discord illustrates the ongoing rift in the GOP that Cheney embodied for many years.
Adding to the controversy, Cheney’s final major political act was endorsing Kamala Harris. “Put country above partisanship,” he stated in his endorsement, signaling his disorientation with the path his party has taken. Such a move underscores a shift in Cheney’s views over the years, moving from a bastion of conservative principles to a figure at odds with a party increasingly aligning with Trumpian rhetoric.
Cheney’s national security legacy looms large, especially considering his key role in the Iraq War and post-9/11 security measures. He championed the expansion of federal surveillance powers, advocating for the Patriot Act and warrantless wiretapping, actions that were later criticized as overreaches. Georgetown law professor Stephen Vladeck noted the significant impact of Cheney’s decisions on the security state, asserting, “I do think the security state that we have today is very much a product of our reaction to September 11.”
The controversial decision to invade Iraq stands as one of Cheney’s most polarizing legacies. Advocating the belief that Saddam Hussein held weapons of mass destruction, Cheney’s push for military action resulted in a costly and prolonged conflict that reshaped the region and left a lasting impression on both U.S. domestic policy and international relations.
Reflecting on these missteps, Senator Ed Markey commented, “It was a mistake to rely upon the Bush administration for telling the truth.” Such reflections further illustrate the contentious nature of Cheney’s legacy and the polarization surrounding his influence on American politics.
Cheney’s strategic decisions reverberated beyond foreign policy, positively affecting domestic initiatives that expanded government monitoring capabilities. His assertion that enhanced wiretapping powers could have captured critical intelligence pre-9/11 exemplifies the justification for such measures, even as they ignited fierce debates about civil liberties in contemporary society.
In media tributes, figures like CNN’s Dana Bash and John King recognized Cheney’s multifaceted character. King recounted Cheney’s acknowledgment of his villainous reputation, saying that he “pretty much embraced being the Darth Vader of American politics.” This self-awareness indicates Cheney’s complex relationship with public perception, a narrative that will likely endure in discussions about his life and policies.
The mixed reactions to Cheney’s endorsement of Harris showcase the fractious climate within Republican circles. Some expressed amusement or skepticism, while others, like Senator John Barrasso, offered more traditional remembrances, praising Cheney as a “towering figure” in history.
Former President George W. Bush’s statement highlighted a deep personal connection, saying, “I’m still grateful that he was at my side for the eight years that followed,” while also recognizing Cheney as a “patriot who brought integrity” to his service. Such sentiments reflect the loyalty that Cheney commanded among those he closely worked with, despite his divisive policies.
Cheney’s family described him as a great man who instilled love for country, courage, and kindness in his children and grandchildren. These personal reflections juxtapose the public’s more complicated perceptions of his legacy, blending personal loss with political discord.
A confirmed collapse in health preceded Cheney’s death, allowing time for reflection on his complex legacy. Survived by his wife and children, Cheney’s life intertwined with both critique and reverence, revealing a Republican Party grappling with identity in a polarized nation.
As the country processes his death, the discourse surrounding Cheney serves as a reminder of the intertwining paths of duty, controversy, and the ongoing struggle for clarity in American politics.
"*" indicates required fields
