Drop Site News, founded in 2024 by former staff from The Intercept, has positioned itself as a stronghold for a singular narrative. Its focus on Israel as the antagonist and Hamas as the victim is evident, raising questions about its credibility. The outlet claims to be “completely independent” and “reader-supported,” yet recent revelations from the Washington Free Beacon suggest otherwise. According to Chuck Ross, the Open Society Foundations, controlled by George Soros and his son Alexander, granted Drop Site $250,000, challenging the notion of financial independence.
The funds came via the Social Security Works Education Fund, which has a stated goal of educating the public about social security benefits. However, the connection seems tenuous at best, particularly since Drop Site News hardly addresses social security issues. Instead, it operates as a platform that amplifies a specific political agenda. This misuse of funds reveals the growing intertwining of political financing and media narratives.
Moreover, scrutiny of Drop Site’s content shows a significant imbalance. The outlet devotes nearly all its attention to stories about Israel and Hamas, with only peripheral coverage of other events. The narratives it propagates suggest a reluctance to present an unbiased view of a complex conflict. In fact, Ryan Grim and Jeremy Scahill, the founders, are known for their biases favoring those opposing Israel. Their initial major scoop involved interviews with Hamas leaders, framed as a way to shed light on the organization’s motives behind the attacks on October 7, 2023. Such portrayals enhance concerns over the outlet’s objectivity.
The financing from the Open Society Foundations is not an isolated incident. It is part of a broader trend where Soros’s organizations contribute significant funds to groups with ties to Hamas and other Palestinian entities. Evidence indicates that the Foundations distributed $4 million to three Palestinian organizations—Al Haq, the Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights—before the recent attacks on Israel. These groups are now on the U.S. sanctions list due to their connections with terrorism.
This is not Soros’s first venture into controversial territory. In a 2007 Financial Times op-ed, he controversially placed the blame for Hamas’s actions on Israel and the United States, arguing that Israel’s handling of political outcomes in Gaza was detrimental. His stance has garnered criticism, especially in light of ongoing violence and the increasing complexity of Middle Eastern politics.
The evolving media landscape reflects this reliance on biased reporting, raising critical questions about the narratives being shaped and disseminated. Drop Site News exemplifies how financial backing can influence the portrayal of events, potentially skewing public perception while masquerading as independent journalism. As the conflict in the region remains volatile, the implications of such coverage will likely extend far beyond the digital pages of a Substack newsletter.
Ultimately, the intertwining of funding, media narratives, and political agendas necessitates a careful examination of what constitutes credible journalism. The case of Drop Site News serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the need for vigilance against biased reporting masked as independent truth-seeking. As media consumers assess the information they encounter, a discerning eye will be crucial in navigating the complex and often misleading narratives that dominate discussions surrounding contentious international topics.
"*" indicates required fields
