Elon Musk knows how to spark a conversation, and his latest tweet is no exception. On Monday, he posted, “Instagram makes people depressed & Twitter makes people angry. Which is better?” This statement immediately ignited a flurry of reactions from users across social media, triggering a broader dialogue about how each platform impacts its users’ emotional well-being.
Musk’s comment collected thousands of likes and retweets as users expressed their opinions, either defending their platform or challenging his assertion. One user quipped that “LinkedIn actually makes people depressed, not Instagram,” to which Musk responded with a fire emoji. Another said, “Twitter doesn’t make me angry but makes me laugh all day long,” and Musk agreed, saying, “I do laugh a lot on Twitter.” These exchanges highlight the subjective nature of social media experiences.
Yet, not everyone found the banter amusing. Some users, like commentator @CollinRugg, voiced their frustration over being inundated with posts from public figures like Musk. “Why do they keep putting this irrational politician in my feed???” he posted, resonating with many who feel overwhelmed by content they don’t choose to see.
Beyond the playful exchanges, Musk’s tweet taps into a serious issue: the influence of social media on mental health. Studies indicate he may have touched on something significant. For instance, research published in the Journal of Mental Health links Instagram usage among teens to increased feelings of anxiety and depression. This stems largely from the platform’s focus on idealized images and lifestyles. Conversely, Twitter’s combative format often leads to heightened stress among adult users who frequently engage with the platform.
A report from the Pew Research Center reveals that 46% of adult Twitter users feel “angry or overwhelmed” at least some of the time when using the app. Despite these negative feelings, many continue to log in daily for real-time news and a channel to interact with public figures or share humor. Here lies the paradox of social media: users are often drawn back in, regardless of the emotional toll.
Dr. Asha Malhotra, a clinical psychologist, explained the phenomenon: “There’s an emotional trade-off. Instagram quietly encourages comparison. Twitter runs hotter—it encourages confrontation or rapid-fire reactions. Neither is emotionally neutral.” This observation underscores the diverging emotional landscapes of these platforms, inviting a deeper consideration of how they shape user behavior.
Reactions to Musk’s tweet reveal just how polarizing the discussion can be. While some users supported his perspective, others criticized him for oversimplifying the issue. A sentiment that emerged repeatedly was that algorithms play a significant role in amplifying negative content. As @CollinRugg’s irritation signals, social media companies frequently dictate what appears on user feeds without their consent or awareness.
Content moderation algorithms often prioritize high-engagement posts, elevating controversial figures and statements. This shift has prompted discussions about how Twitter, under Musk’s leadership, has modified its recommendation engine. Critics argue that such changes blur the lines between what is trending and what users genuinely wish to see, transforming personal timelines into unpredictable stages for content that can provoke or agitate.
Evidence shows that emotional exposure on social media is cumulative, impacting users not just momentarily but in lasting ways. Research from Dartmouth University found that users reported increased alertness and agitation after browsing Twitter, while Instagram users experienced moments of tranquility—punctuated by dips in self-worth, highlighting the damage that comparison can cause.
Dr. Malhotra emphasized the importance of recognizing these patterns: “We shouldn’t underestimate these effects. Emotional patterns become habits. When a platform consistently evokes a reaction—whether anger, anxiety, or envy—it shapes how users process digital experiences and even interpersonal beliefs.” Musk’s framing of his tweet, while playful, raises meaningful questions about the influence of technology on public interaction and mental health.
Musk’s significant presence on Twitter complicates the situation. His posts reach millions in mere moments, accumulating reactions that unfold without context or nuance. Critics argue that allowing billionaires or political figures to dominate social media feeds exacerbates misinformation and promotes unhealthy engagement trends. On the other hand, some see this openness as essential for free discourse, suggesting breaking away from traditional media filters can be beneficial.
However, the data is alarming: Twitter encourages a more reactive atmosphere. Instagram promotes an identity rooted in comparison. Critics like @CollinRugg express frustration with unwanted exposure to certain personalities, a symptom of automated algorithms prioritizing attention-grabbing content over user preferences. The question remains unresolved: should digital platforms be engineered to change the emotional tone that they do?
Public trust in social media has diminished considerably. According to a 2023 survey, 44% of Americans feel social media does more harm than good, a sentiment particularly strong among conservatives, with 61% expressing that view. Musk’s observations about the feelings of anger and depression linked to social platforms may carry weight in conversations about future internet regulation.
Europe is already moving towards more stringent rules regarding platform design and mental health. In the U.S., proposals like the Kids Online Safety Act reflect a growing awareness of the pressing need for legislation to address the emotional impacts of social media. Yet, as Musk continues to tweet, the effects on users unfold in real time. The motivations behind his interactions on the platform remain uncertain—provocation, humor, or an intent to reform—but one thing is clear: the influence of Twitter on public discourse and emotional health is undeniable.
Dr. Malhotra offers a final thought that urges deeper reflection: “If a platform makes you angry every day, it’s not just a joke. It’s a design choice—and a consequence.” This statement encapsulates a critical aspect of the digital landscape, where the dynamics of engagement can have wide-ranging effects on users’ emotional and mental well-being.
"*" indicates required fields
