An advice column from Dartmouth has sparked significant online discussion, exposing a reality often overlooked in casual relationships. A student, under the name “Ho In Demand,” reached out for guidance on how to conclude a non-romantic, physically intimate relationship with a male peer who frequently spent the night at her apartment. As her interest in someone new grew, she sought a way to disengage without confrontation.
The column, featured in Freak of the Week, dives straight into a widespread dilemma faced by many young people today. The online response was immediate, suggesting many found her situation relatable. One user on X, known as @CollinRugg, expressed disbelief, stating, “So did this guy just now finally realize it? He must’ve lived under a rock.” This comment underscores the disconnection often seen in these arrangements—where one party moves through the relationship without seeing the clarity that another assumes they share.
In her letter, “Ho In Demand” insists, “I’m not dating him—we’re not even talking—he’s just… been coming over all term.” Her desire to transition gracefully indicates she recognizes the emotional weight carried in ambiguous relationships. The columnists, Eli and Leila, pushed for straightforward communication. They noted, “Being on the receiving end of a ‘I don’t want to see you anymore’ sucks, but it’s worse if you just ghost.” Their advice promoted the idea of a candid discussion, suggesting wording that seeks closure while preserving respect: “Hey, I’ve really liked hanging out with you, but with the summer ending, I want to try new things. Let’s keep in touch!”
This situation reflects a significant truth in modern dating dynamics. The college culture of casual relationships often leads to unclear expectations, resulting in emotion-laden outcomes. Research from the American Psychological Association indicates that over 60% of college students engage in hookup-style encounters, with almost half feeling emotionally invested afterward. Critics argue the disconnect arises not from casual intimacy itself but from insufficient communication about intentions and feelings.
A reader’s commentary, “If you’re old enough to bring someone into your room, you should be old enough to tell them it’s over,” echoes a fundamental principle of respect in interpersonal relationships. This stark reminder highlights the ongoing debate surrounding emotional accountability in casual settings. Many young men may equate frequent physical intimacy with deepening affection. When a woman decides to switch her focus without prior dialogue, it leads to confusion and resentment.
The advisors’ proposed scripts aim to provide clarity amid this chaos. Eli’s suggestion of saying, “I think the fact this isn’t going anywhere serious means it’s time for me to try something new,” emphasizes respect while firmly ending an ambiguous arrangement. Such clarity is crucial to gently sever ties, mitigating the emotional fallout that often arises from silence or vague messaging.
These issues extend beyond personal relationships; college faculty and counselors are noticing similar trends. According to a recent National College Health Assessment study, over 28% of students reported feeling “emotionally drained” due to relationship-related stress. This stress, largely attributed to ambiguous romantic expectations, contributes to growing anxiety and negatively impacts overall mental health in academic environments.
The context of this advice column aligns with a common seasonal shift in academia—relationships tend to naturally conclude with the end of the school year. However, emotional habits can keep individuals bound longer than necessary, as expressed by the advice-seeker waiting until term’s end to address her situation. As one columnist observed, “Breakups are easy to talk about in theory but hard to execute in practice.”
Younger generations may be surprised by the passivity of these evolving relationship dynamics. A peer consistently visits, spends nights, and behaves in ways that mirror courtship, yet without explicit communication about expectations. The underlying truth remains: ignoring the situation does not make it disappear.
When direct communication feels radical, it raises questions about how social norms have evolved. Universities are increasingly offering workshops addressing assertiveness and emotional boundaries, yet there remains a gap between students’ desire for open dialogue and the reality of their dating behaviors.
The necessity for education around healthy relationship dynamics may also warrant examination by policy planners and student life leaders. While there has been considerable focus on legal definitions of consensual behavior, the nuances of emotional ethics remain largely unaddressed. As counseling services face demand and long wait times at institutions such as UCLA and the University of Michigan, equipping students with tools for clear communication could alleviate some of these burdens.
Ultimately, the timeless advice of honesty remains paramount: be clear, be concise, and be kind. This approach retains its importance across all types of relationships as they involve human emotions and vulnerabilities. As the cost of clarity may be discomfort, the price of avoidance often leads to confusion and regret.
As @CollinRugg’s blunt observation reflects, there’s little sympathy for those who ignore the obvious for too long. “So did this guy just now finally realize it? He must’ve lived under a rock.” In an era defined by instant communication, perhaps both sides share a deeper confusion about understandings that were never verbalized.
"*" indicates required fields
