A federal prison sentence was handed down on Friday to Zimnako Salah, a man who instigated a series of hoax bomb threats targeting Christian churches in Arizona. Convicted in March, Salah’s actions reflected not only a personal vendetta but also a broader motivation linked to his extremist beliefs. The U.S. Department of Justice underscored the severity of his crimes, categorizing them as a hate crime aimed at individuals based solely on their religious beliefs.
Throughout the fall of 2023, Salah instigated fear among churchgoers by leaving backpacks in multiple locations, including a church in Scottsdale where congregants discovered one such backpack among the pews. Fortunately, the contents were innocuous—merely clothes—but the intentions behind Salah’s actions were far more sinister. In another instance, a backpack was strapped to a toilet at a church in Roseville, which signaled a blatant disregard for safety in places of worship.
Investigators uncovered shocking details about Salah’s activities. He had not only threatened the safety of Christians but also appeared to be engineering an actual explosive device. In his storage unit, FBI agents found components typically used in the construction of an improvised explosive device (IED), including propane canisters, duct tape, wires, and a Quran. This discovery painted a grim picture of a man dangerously close to executing his malevolent plans.
Salah’s online behavior further affirmed his extremist mindset. He scoured social media for videos depicting violence against “infidels” and expressed his ambitions to inflict harm. Days before committing these acts, he ominously declared on social media that “we are going to destroy” America. These statements revealed a chilling intent that was cut short by the vigilance of church security and law enforcement.
U.S. Attorney Eric Grant articulated the potential consequences had Salah’s plans gone unchecked. He stated that “Salah’s seeming ultimate goal to bomb a Christian church would have resulted in many deaths and injuries if his plan had not been thwarted.” His comments stressed not only the immediate danger posed by Salah but also the essential role of community vigilance in safeguarding freedoms. By intervening, church security, local law enforcement, and the FBI collectively ensured that a tragedy was averted.
Grant’s remarks echoed a vital principle: the right to worship freely, without fear of violence or intimidation, is fundamental in America. In this climate, the federal prosecution of hate crimes remains a priority, emphasizing that motives steeped in prejudice and hate will not be tolerated. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon reinforced this sentiment, stating that “those who target people because of their faith will face the full force of federal law.”
The six-year prison sentence handed down to Salah serves as a reminder of the consequences of hate-driven actions. It emphasizes a commitment to protecting the rights of individuals of all faiths to live without fear or threat. The message is clear: violence has no place in religious expression, and those who attempt to exploit it for destructive ends will be held accountable.
In an age where religious intolerance appears on the rise, the actions taken against Salah signify an ongoing commitment to uphold the values of liberty and justice. The hope remains that such measures will deter future acts of hate and encourage a society where all can worship freely, in peace.
"*" indicates required fields
